>
>>> >> > int main () {
>>> >> > f1(2);
>>> >> > return 0;
>>> >> >
>>> >> > }
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:0
st1.ary1[1] = i1 + 1;
> >> >> > assert( st1.ary1[1] == 3);
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > int main () {
> >> >> > f1(2);
> >> >> > return 0;
> >> >> >
> &
an be submit in 1-2
>>> days :)
>>>
>>> Happy New year.
>>>
>>> Ling Kun
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Original --
>>> *From: * "Sun Chan";
>>> *Date: * Sun, Jan 1, 2
> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > int main () {
>> >> > f1(2);
>> >> > return 0;
>> >> >
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Gang Yu wrote
> >>
> >> >> Hi, Ling Kun:
> >> >>
> >> >> Glad to hear loongson team has solved this issue! I googled this
> >> >> feature on gnu site, I do not find the relevant documents. Could you
> >> >> please
> >&
gt;> Regards
>> >> Gang
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2012/1/1 凌坤
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi, Sun:
>> >>> I am glad to do that. And now I am trying to merge this patch to
>> >>> Open64 svn trunck
ge this patch to
> >>> Open64 svn trunck, it is a little complex to try to pick it from the
> >>> Loongson branch :)
> >>>Hoping that a patch that can pass some testcase can be submit in 1-2
> >>> days :)
> >>>
> >>>Happy New y
ck, it is a little complex to try to pick it from the
>>> Loongson branch :)
>>>Hoping that a patch that can pass some testcase can be submit in 1-2
>>> days :)
>>>
>>>Happy New year.
>>>
>>> Ling Kun
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>
>
> -- Original --
> *From: * "Sun Chan";
> *Date: * Sun, Jan 1, 2012 02:25 PM
> *To: * "Ling Kun"; **
> *Cc: * "open64-devel"; **
> *Subject: * Re: [Open64-devel] Current build status for linux kernel on
> open
-- Original --
From: "Sun Chan";
Date: Sun, Jan 1, 2012 02:25 PM
To: "Ling Kun";
Cc: "open64-devel";
Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] Current build status for linux kernel on open64
LingKun,
can you send the changes for VLS (or VLA) to this a
LingKun,
can you send the changes for VLS (or VLA) to this alias (or send to me
and Yugang privately and we can help review and test out on x86) for
review?
Sun
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Ling Kun wrote:
> hi, Gang Yu:
> Loongson compiler(based on Open64) team have successfully build M
hi, Gang Yu:
Loongson compiler(based on Open64) team have successfully build MIPS
Linux kernel 2.6.35, and make it run on Qemu. And we have solved the VLA
issue, the debug record and patches (based on the Open64 trunck svn r28xx)
of Loongson teams' work have be sent to Zhu qing.
If it is po
Since C99 VLA has been supported, the similar schema can be used to
support the VLS.
2011/12/31 Gang Yu :
> Thanks. we also wish could get input from the original wgen authors, it is
> leaving an unsupported feature for VLA and then compiler asserts. In order
> to avoid duplication of effort, we w
Thanks. we also wish could get input from the original wgen authors, it is
leaving an unsupported feature for VLA and then compiler asserts. In order
to avoid duplication of effort, we wish learn from the seniors and then we
can go ahead or make workaround.
Regards
Gang
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at
Let me try to understand. You are asking for opinions on whether ope64
should ignore the VLA problem until there is further documentation
and/or evidence of more VLA usage? Until then, workaround that by
changing kernel source?
Sun
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gang Yu wrote:
> Hi, list:
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
