Re: [Open64-devel] Fix for bug 771, problem in global value numbering.

2011-10-11 Thread 朱庆
We also find the IA build fail due to the fix. We already make a patch to fix the problem, will send out review soon. zhuqing 2011/10/11 shenrfen : > Hi, Doug > There is no definition of "TCON_R10" for other target! > Build fail for other target! > > -Original Message- > From: Gilmore, Do

Re: [Open64-devel] Fix for bug 771, problem in global value numbering.

2011-10-11 Thread shenrfen
Hi, Doug There is no definition of "TCON_R10" for other target! Build fail for other target! -Original Message- From: Gilmore, Doug [mailto:doug.gilm...@amd.com] Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 9:07 AM To: open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Open64-devel] Fix for bug 771, proble

Re: [Open64-devel] Fix for bug 771, problem in global value numbering.

2011-10-08 Thread Gilmore, Doug
From: Jian-Xin Lai [mailto:laij...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 11:21 PM To: Gilmore, Doug Cc: open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] Fix for bug 771, problem in global value numbering. Looks like the opt_vn.cxx_patch is unnecessary? [Doug: ] Right, the

Re: [Open64-devel] Fix for bug 771, problem in global value numbering.

2011-10-08 Thread Sun Chan
this is the kind of trace I had always wanted from day one. Thx for taking the trouble to doing that right. Sun On 10/7/11, Jian-Xin Lai wrote: > Looks like the opt_vn.cxx_patch is unnecessary? > For the other two patches, they are OK to me. > > 2011/10/8 Gilmore, Doug > >> There are two changes

Re: [Open64-devel] Fix for bug 771, problem in global value numbering.

2011-10-07 Thread Jian-Xin Lai
Looks like the opt_vn.cxx_patch is unnecessary? For the other two patches, they are OK to me. 2011/10/8 Gilmore, Doug > There are two changes I would like to have reviewed. > > One is trace_cleanup.patch, which cleans up CODEREP > tracing output in WOPT. Without the patch the following > tracin