[Open64-devel] Review request for fix bug908(lower bit_field assertion failure)[WGEN]

Hi, Could a gatekeepler please help review the patch for fix bug908 https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=908? A cutdown bugcase: typedef unsigned int __u32; typedef unsigned long long __u64; typedef unsigned char __u8; struct in_core_key { __u32 k_dir_id; /* packing localit

Re: [Open64-devel] Review request for fix bug908(lower bit_field assertion failure)[WGEN]

Looks good to me Sun On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Gang Yu wrote: > Hi, > >Could a gatekeepler please help review the patch for fix bug908 > https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=908? > > A cutdown bugcase: > > typedef unsigned int __u32; > typedef unsigned long long __u64; > typedef un

[Open64-devel] New Open64 Coding Guidelines Available

Hello Everyone In order to improve Open64 quality and maintainability, Sun and our Open64 gatekeepers have worked on developing Open64 Coding Guidelines, and they have been posted on our Open64.net Wiki page:  We also hope these Open64 Coding Guidelines will help expedite Open64 patch reviews. h

[Open64-devel] r3829 - in trunk/osprey: be/be be/cg be/com common/com common/util driver

Author: jaewook Date: 2011-11-30 13:35:54 -0500 (Wed, 30 Nov 2011) New Revision: 3829 Modified: trunk/osprey/be/be/driver.cxx trunk/osprey/be/be/driver_util.cxx trunk/osprey/be/cg/Makefile.gbase trunk/osprey/be/cg/cg.cxx trunk/osprey/be/cg/tn.h trunk/osprey/be/cg/tnutil.cxx tr