why don't you bite the bullet and figure out why you got that
assertion. I used your same reasoning and conclude that you should
always do -O0 and you have no answer.
Sun
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Gang Yu wrote:
> Some reasons to defend the fix suggestion:
>
> a.) it's a bug due to aggressi
Two comments:
1. This patch is not generic enough. If the type tenths is shor or
other, it still fails. I think there are some other case (the parent
is not STID) also causes the same problem.
2. The function prototype change can be applied to all architecture.
2012/2/24 Gang Yu :
> Hi,
>
> Coul
Thanks, Sun. I tested extensively, including running SPEC CPU2006
with -apo and did not see any changes.
I'll commit the change in a few days if there are no objections.
2012/3/5 Sun Chan :
> I did not review the changes since it's all about removing code, which
> is always a good thing. As long
