-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Are machine accounts still a function of OpenAFS 1.4 RC1-6 ?
I setup a user with the IP of one of our workstations as username, I
created a group and add the IP as member of this group.
After that I set a directory of our afs for this group to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lars Schimmer wrote:
Hi!
Are machine accounts still a function of OpenAFS 1.4 RC1-6 ?
I setup a user with the IP of one of our workstations as username, I
created a group and add the IP as member of this group.
After that I set a directory of
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Lars Schimmer wrote:
Are machine accounts still a function of OpenAFS 1.4 RC1-6 ?
Why not?
I setup a user with the IP of one of our workstations as username, I
created a group and add the IP as member of this group.
After that I set a directory of our afs for this
Hi!
Is anyone using openafs on ubuntu 5.04? I'm trying to compile the
module (debian-like package), but it fails on make-kpkg modules_image
with this error:
configure: error: no available sys_call_table access method
And this reminds me that the current packages are openafs-1.2.13...
Is
Lars Schimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lars Schimmer wrote:
Hi!
Are machine accounts still a function of OpenAFS 1.4 RC1-6 ?
I setup a user with the IP of one of our workstations as username, I
created a group and add the IP as member of this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Huebsch wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Lars Schimmer wrote:
Are machine accounts still a function of OpenAFS 1.4 RC1-6 ?
Why not?
I setup a user with the IP of one of our workstations as username, I
created a group and add the
Is anyone using openafs on ubuntu 5.04?
I am, but I'm not using the ubuntu kernel. I'm using 2.6.12-rc3 from
kernel.org with nfs4 patches from citi (that shouldn't make any difference).
I build by pulling source from OpenAFS cvs head:
./configure --with-afs-sysname=i386_linux26
* Sensei [2005-10-11 16:22:56 +0200]:
Is anyone using openafs on ubuntu 5.04?
Not me, but I have a user who is running 5.10 on his laptop. Installing
the OpenAFS client was as easy as enabling the universe repository in
/etc/apt/sources.list, installing module-assistant and openafs-client
(and
Lars Schimmer wrote:
I restarted the AFS service on windows client, no success.
Lars:
There have been no changes to the Windows client that would impact
whether or not the file server concludes that the IP address the client
is coming from should or should not be granted access due to an IP
On Oct 11, 2005, at 4:55 pm, Sergio Gelato wrote:
Not me, but I have a user who is running 5.10 on his laptop.
Installing
the OpenAFS client was as easy as enabling the universe
repository in
/etc/apt/sources.list, installing module-assistant and openafs-client
(and heimdal-clients for
Trying what I said in your reply, I get a nice afs process freeze,
but no kernel panic.
Mmh... I'm puzzled...
--
Sensei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its
limits. (A. Einstein)
___
* Sensei [2005-10-11 17:18:31 +0200]:
What I did is using the breezy packages (downloaded and forced dpkg),
but the scripts are really weird. Setting
OPTIONS=MEMORY
CACHESIZE=5
seem not to affect the init.d script, telling me that my partition is
not supported: it's an XFS
Hello,
I'm facing a somewhat severe stability problem with OpenAFS 1.3.87 and
1.4.0-rc6 on Solaris 10, on both i386 and Sparc.
Using one of the new SMF command can easily trigger a panic on
Solaris 10 when OpenAFS is running.
Specifically, the problem happens when running the svcs -p command
For whatever it's worth I was able to reproduce the behavior you
described with 1.4.0-rc4 on Solaris 10 (sparc).
Another problem I've seen consistently on Solaris 10 is that if the
NFS server is put under load while the AFS kernel module is loaded the
system panics. I ran into this initially
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:40 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
Note that the Breezy packages are still 1.3.81, which is rather old;
you may be missing some important memcache-related bug fixes. Better
upgrade to the latest 1.4.0 rc.
1.4RC1 has been in Breezy for quite some time, and I guess that
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 19:19 +0200, Björn Torkelsson wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:40 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
Note that the Breezy packages are still 1.3.81, which is rather old;
you may be missing some important memcache-related bug fixes. Better
upgrade to the latest 1.4.0 rc.
Sergio Gelato [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should be able to do something similar in 5.04. Take the
openafs-modules-source package from Russ Allbery's repository (the URL
is in the archives for this list), so you'll get a recent 1.4.0 release
candidate.
1.4.0-rc4 is now in Debian unstable,
Björn Torkelsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1.4RC1 has been in Breezy for quite some time, and I guess that will be
what is in Breezy when it is released in a few days. I can't see much of
a point of upgrading to a later RC this late.
If you want to support 2.6.13, you need 1.4.0-rc6. If I
Sensei [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I did is using the breezy packages (downloaded and forced dpkg),
but the scripts are really weird. Setting
OPTIONS=MEMORY
CACHESIZE=5
seem not to affect the init.d script, telling me that my partition is
not supported: it's an XFS filesystem,
Hi,
how can I get the list of (super)groups, a group is member of?
This seems to be possible for users only (pts m [user]) but
not for groups.
Regards,
Frank
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
According to Logan O'Sullivan Bruns:
For whatever it's worth I was able to reproduce the behavior you
described with 1.4.0-rc4 on Solaris 10 (sparc).
Thanks, I guess that presumably reduces the possibility of a
configuration error on my side.
Another problem I've seen consistently on
Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thing. It does some pretty hideous things to get something approaching
reasonable security semantics, given the assumptions people make about
how access controls work on UNIX filesystems.
Could you elaborate on this? My understanding was that it
I'm using the nonfs version. It's not a big problem for me and I
wouldn't have even noticed it except that I have a few netras without
cdrom drives. In any case, it's pretty infrequent that I have to use
it as a boot server. I just figured since some developer will probably
be doing some testing
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Loic Tortay writes:
Hello,
Specifically, the problem happens when running the svcs -p command
...
About one time out of three, the system will panic immediatly.
i seem to get it about every time. analysis follows. i had two traps
in different but similar locations,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Loic Tortay writes:
If so, has someone a clue on where to look for the origin of this
problem ?
can you try this:
. keep afs from autostarting (rename startup script)
. add set default_stksize=0x8000 to /etc/system
. reboot
. login and manually start afs
According to chas williams - CONTRACTOR:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Loic Tortay writes:
If so, has someone a clue on where to look for the origin of this
problem ?
can you try this:
. keep afs from autostarting (rename startup script)
. add set default_stksize=0x8000 to /etc/system
.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Loic Tortay writes:
On the other hand, if I re-enable the automatic startup of AFS the
problem reappears (with the default stack size still set to 32 kB).
but you do seem to need it. manually starting afs w/o increasing the
default stack size seems to run into this
this might work better. prepend ctrun -l none -i none to
/usr/vice/etc/afsd $OPTIONS in /etc/init.d/afs so it reads
ctrun -l none -i none /usr/vice/etc/afsd $OPTIONS
i dont quite understand this. it guess smf is providing a process
contract for any of the daemons it starts. if a daemon
Hi Derek,
I have the rc6 stuff in place now.
The kernel module seems to load ok.
afsd starts.. but then stalls and freezes the system.
here's what it shows (I redirected output before it freezes the
system)
Starting AFS services.
afsd: My home cell is 'csc.depauw.edu'
SScall(137, 28,
I compile 1.4.0-rc6 with --enable-namei-fileserver as was surprised
to see:
Tue Oct 11 17:30:13 2005 XFS/EFS File server starting
Tue Oct 11 17:30:13 2005 Partition /vicepa: XFS inodes too small,
exiting.
Tue Oct 11 17:30:13 2005 Run xfs_size_check utility and remake
partitions.
Tue
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jason Mader writes:
Tue Oct 11 17:30:13 2005 XFS/EFS File server starting
it probably should say namei instead of xfs/efs as well.
How come the /vicepa partition needs the larger inodes with the namei
fileserver?
it shouldnt. try this:
Index:
Sorry for the delay, it's getting late here.
According to chas williams - CONTRACTOR:
this might work better. prepend ctrun -l none -i none to
/usr/vice/etc/afsd $OPTIONS in /etc/init.d/afs so it reads
ctrun -l none -i none /usr/vice/etc/afsd $OPTIONS
With the addition of ctrun (with and
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, JEBs wrote:
Now that I got openafs running well, I require the functionality of a tool
named 'chbind' from the vserver project (http://linux-vserver.org/).
After patching the kernel with the vserver stuff, the openAFS module
compiles but abort loading with a openafs:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:15:30 AM -0700 Adam Megacz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thing. It does some pretty hideous things to get something approaching
reasonable security semantics, given the assumptions people make about
how access controls
34 matches
Mail list logo
