Can someone running OpenAFS on Debian let me know if bos getlog works
for them?
Debian etch, x86_64:
kelvin:~$ bos getlog kelvin FileLog
Fetching log file 'FileLog'...
bos: no such entity (while reading log)
Same thing with sarge on i386. Both packages up-to-date from
ftp.fi.debian.org and
Dear all,
What is the use/purpose of a separate (ie separate
disk partition) AFS cache? Some older servers I
inherited have this (100MB), instead of the default
auto-made /var/cache/openafs cahe (seems to be 9GB),
which is
simpler IMHO.
Some googling shows a separate reserved-space afs
cache
avison48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
So it is worth it to set up afscache partition?
The default on all our other machines seems fine.
IMHO the less post-OS load tweaks, the better.
It depends on how the machine is going to be used. If you have things
that create large log files in /var,
Marcus Watts wrote:
avison48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
So it is worth it to set up afscache partition?
The default on all our other machines seems fine.
IMHO the less post-OS load tweaks, the better.
It depends on how the machine is going to be used. If you have things
that
Hi!
Does anyone have any experience using legato networker to back up afs
volumes? We would like to switch from vos dump all volumes to an extra
raid array -backups to using legato (since that's the de facto backup
solution around here). What's the best way to do it?
I found this
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2006 03:53:23 PM -0400 Peter N. Schweitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# nm afs_osi.o | grep tasklist_lock
U tasklist_lock
OK; this is the one we're looking for. That, combined with Stefaan's
comment about not having the problem if
You should/might find that http://noc.hep.wisc.edu/NetWorkerAFS.txt
works nicely. But... Legato as stopped shipping the executable
(nsrfile) that encapsulates vos dump streams into NetWorker dump
streams... so NetWorkerAFS v0 is essentially at the end of it's life.
This winter I'll either 1)
Juha Jäykkä wrote:
I found this
http://68.100.67.187:3000/openafs/afs-backup-to-legato.tar.gz, but I'm
unsure as to how reliable/useful it is. Certainly it seems like less work
than what would be required to build a backup-to-legato -system from
scratch. Anyone using this?
I wrote that and
Title: cofiguring OpenAFS on Xen
I'm in the public beta testing of the EC2 Service from Amazon and I've tried to get openafs installed on an instance, but I'm having issues.
Here is my post on the EC2 Forum. http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa?threadID=11858=0
I've
This is really beyond the scope of openafs-info, but...
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Peter N. Schweitzer wrote:
Not to belabor the point, but for my understanding, the tasklist_lock
variable within the AFS module and the variable by the same name within
some parts of the kernel code (sched.c, for
* Christopher D. Clausen [2006-10-30 01:29:38 -0600]:
Can someone running OpenAFS on Debian let me know if bos getlog works
for them?
It doesn't work out of the box, but a simple
ln -s /var/log/openafs /usr/afs/logs
fixes it.
___
OpenAFS-info
Sergio Gelato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Christopher D. Clausen [2006-10-30 01:29:38 -0600]:
Can someone running OpenAFS on Debian let me know if bos getlog works
for them?
It doesn't work out of the box, but a simple
ln -s /var/log/openafs /usr/afs/logs
fixes it.
Ah nice. Thanks! That
When we moved from Transarc AFS to OpenAFS default permissions
semantics and behavior seem to have changed. When this took place,
one of our other SAs here researched and found some references in
Google to a permissions semantics change, but wasn't able to find any
details. The problem
It's a security hole to allow anyone with write access to gain
administrative priviledges just through mkdir. In OpenAFS
you still have implicit a access given to the owner of a volume
(which is the owner of the root directory node of a volume).
I do not believe there is a compilation flag to
What's the best replacement for the old AFS rsh and
Transarc inetd which does token passing?
I'm using this in a Linux cluster environment so speed is
fairly important - and I'd prefer something as easy to
setup as the old rsh.
Thanks
Rich
--
Rich Sudlow
University of Notre Dame
Center for
On Oct 30, 2006, at 19:15 , Rich Sudlow wrote:
What's the best replacement for the old AFS rsh and
Transarc inetd which does token passing?
openssh with the hpn patches.
The final release of kth-krb4 has an rsh / rshd which forwards
Kerberos 4 tickets and can generate tokens from them.
How about stock openssh, no patches, set up for gss (kerberos)
authentication and ticket passing? That's what I use. Then you can aklog
(or afslog) in your .cshrc (or whatever). No k4 required.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
What's the best replacement for the old AFS rsh and
Transarc inetd which does token passing?
I'm using this in a Linux cluster environment so speed is
fairly important - and I'd prefer something as easy to
setup as the old rsh.
I use the MIT Kerberos rsh/rshd all of the time. I'm not sure what
Sergio Gelato [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christopher D. Clausen [2006-10-30 01:29:38 -0600]:
Can someone running OpenAFS on Debian let me know if bos getlog works
for them?
It doesn't work out of the box, but a simple
ln -s /var/log/openafs /usr/afs/logs
fixes it.
Ew. Sounds like
19 matches
Mail list logo
