Juha =?UTF-8?B?SsOkeWtrw6Q=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
I think you misunderstood me. I wanted to do bos create -server a -type
cron -instance b -cmd /afs/path/script, which does not seem possible
without opening up the ACLs since bos does not seem to forge any tickets
...
Ah! You should
* Jeff Blaine [2007-04-12 17:02:04 -0400]:
I am getting a hard crash and system panic with OpenAFS
1.4.3 built on Solaris 9 SPARC. It happens right after
running 'sh /etc/init.d/afs start' and 'all afs daemons
started' is displayed.
bash-2.05# isainfo -b
32
Have you tried running a
Hi,
how many volsets-entries (those records added by 'backup addvolentry') is the
BDB able to store?
Currently, i've got ~20 volsets usually containing 2 volsetentries each.
Volume patterns. However, the regexps used in BDB are limiting - I'd like
to use PCREs to specify the volumes to backup.
FYI
I just built the rpm packages for RedHat AS 5 using the SRPM for RedHat
AS 4. Everything seems to build correctly and I've installed the client
on one machine and it's working fine.
I will install the server packages next week an try them also.
--
veritatas simplex oratio est
On Apr 12, 2007, at 10:19 AM, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Steve
Simmons write
s:
You also comment that multihomed cells would be listed more than
once. Yes, uniq-ifying them would be good. Can you point me at a cell
to test against?
yeah, i said unique
Bill Stivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know that this discussion was beaten 7 ways from Sunday in the
recent past, but I thought it worth asking. Did someone ever get
around to committing a patch that enabled switching behavior between
implicit a for directory creators versus no implicit a
Adam Megacz wrote:
This patch adds a configure-time --disable-volume-owner-a which
has the desired effect.
Shouldn't this be a run-time switch?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
On Friday, April 13, 2007 05:14:28 PM -0700 Adam Megacz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Stivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know that this discussion was beaten 7 ways from Sunday in the
recent past, but I thought it worth asking. Did someone ever get
around to committing a patch that
