-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
Lars Schimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
While trying to get the afsss.pl script to run I found a glitch with
vos listaddr.
As done via help from the #openafs chat
Gerald Macinenti wrote:
Hi,
I had the following write error on a OpenAFS client:
May 7 04:05:17 myclient kernel: afs: failed to store file (110)
volume backup/dump occurs at 4am, so I guess this is the reason, but
this shouldn't happen isn't it?
is it a bug or is there some tuning that could
I appreciate the help given at the workshop, and wanted to be clear on what
my next steps were. Please correct me if I am wrong:
The problem was traced to an error in the source code of vsprocs.c -
http://www.openafs.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/openafs/src/volser/vspr
ocs.c?rev=1.33.2.19.
Jeff Quinn wrote:
I appreciate the help given at the workshop, and wanted to be clear on
what my next steps were. Please correct me if I am wrong:
The problem was traced to an error in the source code of vsprocs.c -
Hi all,
are there any known issues regarding Gnome/KDE login Manager getting AFS
tokens? I can login perfectly using ssh, or console, get AFS Toks and my
home.
But using GDM/KDM it tells me Can't update authorization file, or
Can't chdir /afs/.daheim/user/user: Permission denied
Seems the
Ralf Hornik Mailings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
are there any known issues regarding Gnome/KDE login Manager getting AFS
tokens? I can login perfectly using ssh, or console, get AFS Toks and my
home. But using GDM/KDM it tells me Can't update authorization file,
or Can't chdir
On May 26, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
. . . Plus, a stable demand-attach is a good milestone for
releasing 1.5 . . .
Agreed.
That said, do we have a milestone list for 1.5 becoming 1.6?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
Steve Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On May 26, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
. . . Plus, a stable demand-attach is a good milestone for
releasing 1.5 . . .
Agreed.
That said, do we have a milestone list for 1.5 becoming 1.6?
At this point, I'm fairly sure that the only major
On May 26, 2008, at 8:16 PM, Esther Filderman wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Robert Banz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, with 1.4, fastrestart is
teh bomb. ;)
Yes, but it's teh bomb that can blow up in your face.
Remember that the salvager is there to make sure you're volumes
On May 29, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On May 26, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
. . . Plus, a stable demand-attach is a good milestone for
releasing 1.5 . . .
Agreed.
That said, do we have a milestone list for 1.5 becoming 1.6?
Steve Simmons wrote:
I'd happily write a script/whathaveyou that looks over the unmounted
volumes and one by one salvages them. It strikes me as the kind of
things you'd want to start running 30 minutes or so after the file
server restarts. A swatch-like script that scans for volumes that
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall someone mentioning that
there were certain cases when running fastrestart where volumes might end
up being attached even if they need salvaging, leading to data
loss/corruption?
I would say any benefit you see in running fastrestart would be
Andy Cobaugh wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall someone mentioning that
there were certain cases when running fastrestart where volumes might
end up being attached even if they need salvaging, leading to data
loss/corruption?
Not corruption but there is a chance that the
Am Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2008 schrieb Ralf Hornik Mailings:
are there any known issues regarding Gnome/KDE login Manager getting AFS
tokens? I can login perfectly using ssh, or console, get AFS Toks and my
home.
But using GDM/KDM it tells me Can't update authorization file, or
Can't chdir
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Steve Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another good reason for us to bring up a test server with it. We're in
early deployment of this summer's upgrades; as soon as the initial set is up
we're going to be trying out a test 1.5 server.
Yes, Moose, this
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Jeffrey Altman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Cobaugh wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall someone mentioning that
there were certain cases when running fastrestart where volumes might end up
being attached even if they need salvaging, leading
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Jeffrey Altman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless, Demand Attach is the best answer we have available.
With DAFS you can restart your file servers and the clients never have
to be sent callback notifications because all of the existing callbacks
are restored
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Esther Filderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Steve Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another good reason for us to bring up a test server with it. We're in
early deployment of this summer's upgrades; as soon as the initial set
18 matches
Mail list logo
