On Sunday 17 June 2012, Ian Crowther wrote:
/var/lib/openafs/local/NetRestrict (/etc/openafs/ too, but at the
moment I'm concerned about the servers) contains a single line on both
servers: 10.1.2.255
Try to use the IP of the interface. I guess using a subnet will only work for
the client
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Ian Crowther i.crowt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've got two 'practice' AFS servers that refuse to stop using
10.1.2.0/24. I'm running 1.4.12.1+dfsg-4 on Debian. OpenAfs works
quite happily apart from this.
vos listaddrs shows:
vos listaddrs
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:07:18 -0400
Derrick Brashear sha...@gmail.com wrote:
/var/lib/openafs/local/NetRestrict (/etc/openafs/ too, but at the
moment I'm concerned about the servers) contains a single line on both
servers: 10.1.2.255
that address doesn't appear in the list of addresses
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:07:17 +0100
Ian Crowther i.crowt...@gmail.com wrote:
#vos listvol 10.1.0.145
Total number of volumes on server 10.1.0.145 partition /vicepa: 6
root.afs.readonly 536870916 RO 2 K On-line
root.cell.readonly536870922 RO 4 K
* Andrew Deason [2012-06-18 10:30:28 -0500]:
NetRestrict(5) still mentions that specifying 255 acts as a wildcard.
80fc888a9223050481de932233fe7121a48df194 removed one mention of that,
but the other remains; should both of them have been removed?
That was the impression I got when I last
Hi everyone,
We migrated from 1.4.X series to 1.4.x series on Linux servers. On the old
systems, the vos backupsys command would like helpful messages like backed
up X volumes. 0 failed: in the log file. Not, it just says that had exit code
15. Things are still getting backed up. What can I
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:33:55 +
Edgecombe, Jason jwedg...@uncc.edu wrote:
We migrated from 1.4.X series to 1.4.x series on Linux servers. On the
I assume that's from 1.4 to 1.6.
old systems, the vos backupsys command would like helpful messages
like backed up X volumes. 0 failed: in the
