Would it be feasible or desirable to have Buildbot actually provide
install-able packages (eg. RPMs on Linux, MSIs on Windows)? It could
help new users confirm yes, this change fixes my bug.
- Ken
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
we talked about doing it for releases; this would be a generalized case of it
possibly, but i can see it becoming a support nightmare. you're running what??
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
Would it be feasible or desirable to have Buildbot actually
At least on Windows, 'no'. The builders have no access to
certificates and private keys necessary for digital signatures and do
not build either the documentation nor the installation packages.
Building complete installation packages would increase the build time
by more than a factor of
Are there any objections to doing this for non-windows platforms? It
could be a nightly build.
On 09/13/2012 12:35 PM, Derrick Brashear wrote:
we talked about doing it for releases; this would be a generalized case of it
possibly, but i can see it becoming a support nightmare. you're running
My big concern is that nightly installable builds will be a support
nightmare.
There are a large number of users that will always take the latest no
matter what.
I realize there is an argument to be made for users being free to do
hang themselves. But I question whether that is what
no objection here, esp. if there's anyone out there with the spare time for and
interest in testing them.
-Original Message-
From: ja...@rampaginggeek.com
Sent: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:21:08 -0400
To: sha...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] buildbot and packages
Are there any
if we do that, nightly (not per patch) builds would be better
Derrick
On Sep 14, 2012, at 0:59, Chaz Chandler cl...@inbox.com wrote:
no objection here, esp. if there's anyone out there with the spare time for
and interest in testing them.
-Original Message-
From:
