Re: [OpenAFS] Linked cells CellServDB syntax ?

2013-08-12 Thread stephen
Thanks! I didn't realize the unix client didn't allow bidirectional linkage (docs for linked cells are hard to find). Anyway, I have gotten this to work now but I had to use the reverse order that you suggested. newcell oldcell #name oldcell #name Otherwise I still got the original error

Re: [OpenAFS] Linked cells CellServDB syntax ?

2013-08-12 Thread Derrick Brashear
the unix client will not allow bidirectional linkage, and you must name the cell being linked to before the cell linking to it, in order, in the CSDB. e.g. oldcell #whatever newcell oldcell #whatever. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > Any known bugs in the parsing of CellSer

Re: [OpenAFS] Linked cells CellServDB syntax ?

2013-08-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
The Windows client supports linking in two directions. I'm not sure that the UNIX client does. Jeffrey Altman On 8/12/2013 5:45 PM, step...@physics.unc.edu wrote: > Hi, > > Any known bugs in the parsing of CellServDB syntax for linked cells? I > ask because I seem to be experiencing one and am

[OpenAFS] Linked cells CellServDB syntax ?

2013-08-12 Thread stephen
Hi, Any known bugs in the parsing of CellServDB syntax for linked cells? I ask because I seem to be experiencing one and am trying to determine if it's a known problem or PEBKAC (problem existing between keyboard and chair). I'm trying linked cells as per the docs I found at

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: Heimdal KDC bug mentioned in rekeying document

2013-08-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 8/10/2013 5:05 AM, Harald Barth wrote: > > The versions where I have seen the problem were: > * 1.5.2 master on Solaris and slave on amd64 FreeBSD > * 1.3.3 master and slave on i386 OpenBSD > The patch which changes the abort() to a warning is at > file:///afs/pdc.kth.se/public/ftp/

[OpenAFS] Re: Help installing openafs-1.6.5 on sunx86: bosserver: fatal: libkrb5.so.1

2013-08-12 Thread Andrew Deason
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:31:02 -0500 John Tang Boyland wrote: > Thanks for checking. Yes, the server that had libkrb5.so.1 on it > works fine with the 1.6.5 binaries, it appears. I'm wondering somehow > the error I got was somehow related to a strange consequence of ONLY > copying this library, a