ext4 is extremely fast with journalling turned off.. even faster than
ext2. For an AFS cache, that would seem to be the ticket.
You can disable it on the filesystem itself with tune2fs,
# Delete has_journal option
tune2fs -O ^has_journal /dev/sda10
# Required fsck
e2fsck -f /dev/sda10
You can
Hello,
if I remember right, somebody wrote a few weeks ago, that with 1.6.x
the choices for the cache partition on Linux systems aren't limited to
ext2 only anymore. Is this correct?
If yes, which filesystems are possible to use (which ones are not)? Does
the cache even need its own partition
On 11/07/2012 05:38 AM, Lars Schimmer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-11-07 11:09, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Hello,
if I remember right, somebody wrote a few weeks ago, that with
1.6.x the choices for the cache partition on Linux systems aren't
limited to ext2 only
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinri...@altum.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch 07 November 2012, 11:38:07 schrieb Lars Schimmer:
On 2012-11-07 11:09, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Hello,
if I remember right, somebody wrote a few weeks ago, that with
1.6.x the choices for the
Am Mittwoch 07 November 2012, 09:02:44 schrieb Marc Dionne:
In my (limited) experience with memcache, it doesn't behave very well
if the system is memory contrained and is under pressure.
Hmm, I wouldn't call a system with 4G memory and not much more running than
KDE with a handful of apps
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Mittwoch 07 November 2012, 09:02:44 schrieb Marc Dionne:
In my (limited) experience with memcache, it doesn't behave very well
if the system is memory contrained and is under pressure.
Hmm, I wouldn't call a system with 4G memory and not much
Last time I used memcache, I had issues with Java applications (Eclipse,
SQLDeveloper). They brought the system to high load until they were finally
OOM-killed when run under KDE on a machine with 4G RAM (512M or 1G of which
set apart for the memcache).
In my (limited) experience with
