enafs-info-admin@ope
> nafs.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk
> > Sent: den 9 februari 2018 01:02
> > To: Kodiak Firesmith <kfiresm...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: openafs-info <openafs-info@openafs.org>
> > Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL 7.5 beta / 3.10.0-830.el7.x86_66 kernel
ail.com>
> Cc: openafs-info <openafs-info@openafs.org>
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL 7.5 beta / 3.10.0-830.el7.x86_66 kernel lock up
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:46:28AM -0500, Kodiak Firesmith wrote:
> > Hello again All,
> >
> > As part of continued te
firesm...@gmail.com>
> Cc: openafs-info <openafs-info@openafs.org>
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL 7.5 beta / 3.10.0-830.el7.x86_66 kernel lock up
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:46:28AM -0500, Kodiak Firesmith wrote:
> > Hello again All,
> >
> > As part of continu
Yes, that patch was added to the master branch. They usually have to
backport patches into the 1.6.x branch before they will work in that
codebase as well.
But...I was able to apply that patch from Gerrit to the 1.8.0pre5 release
and build RPMs off of that. From my testing, that fix appears to
I tried to copy/paste the patch at:
http://git.openafs.org/?p=openafs.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/afs/LINUX/osi_vnodeops.c;h=969a27b271ed3b809f1ddaa462099a5cc09d7886;hp=c1acca962337dff1cf66916c1e3e876bd8468e54;hb=a72dafafddaaa5bfe86c067a605aeffa16572c51;hpb=6d74e3d6a1becf86cec30efc2d01a5692167afe1
But
> On 02.Mar 2018, at 12:40, Gary Gatling wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Stephan Wiesand
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Once we have a change confirmed to fix the EL7.5 issue and not break other
>> platforms, yes. Whether it will be available
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Stephan Wiesand
wrote:
>
>
> Once we have a change confirmed to fix the EL7.5 issue and not break other
> platforms, yes. Whether it will be available quite in time for 7.5 GA is
> hard to say. You can help...
>
>
I will test this patch
On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk
> Sent: den 9 februari 2018 01:02
> To: Kodiak Firesmith <kfiresm...@gmail.com>
> Cc: openafs-info <openafs-info@openafs.org>
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL 7.5 beta / 3.10.0-830.el7.x86_66 kernel lock up
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:4
esm...@gmail.com>
Cc: openafs-info <openafs-info@openafs.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] RHEL 7.5 beta / 3.10.0-830.el7.x86_66 kernel lock up
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:46:28AM -0500, Kodiak Firesmith wrote:
> Hello again All,
>
> As part of continued testing, I've
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:46:28AM -0500, Kodiak Firesmith wrote:
> Hello again All,
>
> As part of continued testing, I've been able to confirm that the SystemD
> double-service startup thing only happens to my hosts when going from RHEL
> 7.4 to RHEL 7.5beta. On a test host installed directly
Hello again All,
As part of continued testing, I've been able to confirm that the SystemD
double-service startup thing only happens to my hosts when going from RHEL
7.4 to RHEL 7.5beta. On a test host installed directly as RHEL 7.5beta, I
get a bit farther with 1.6.18.22, in that I get to the
On 2/5/2018 12:31 PM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> the usual way to use DKMS is to either have it build a module for a newly
> installed kernel or install a prebuilt module for that kernel. It may be
> possible to abuse it for providing a module built for another kernel, but
> I think that won't
> On 04.Feb 2018, at 02:11, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> On 2/2/2018 6:04 PM, Kodiak Firesmith wrote:
>> I'm relatively new to handling OpenAFS. Are these problems part of a
>> normal "kernel release; openafs update" cycle and perhaps I'm getting
>> snagged just by being too
Folks, re-sending this because the first try never hit the list - perhaps
mail with attachments are silently dropped or held for manual moderation?
I'd originally attached an image of the stack trace. I'll host it and
reply to this with a URL link in case that would also result in a drop or
14 matches
Mail list logo