[OpenAFS] Re: State of the Michigan shadow system (long)

2010-12-20 Thread Andrew Deason
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:00:18 -0500 Steve Simmons wrote: > Coming to the more specific vlserver-vlserver-ubiq questions - yeah, > that's hard. If all we're thinking of is simple records that could > (please, god, please!) be shoehorned into the dbs, those are > relatively simple issues. I dunno if

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: State of the Michigan shadow system (long)

2010-12-20 Thread Thomas Kula
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 07:00:18PM -0500, Steve Simmons wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Andrew Deason wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:46:38 -0500 > > Steve Simmons wrote: > > > >> A shadow volume is a read-only remote clone of a primary volume. We > >> had to create some terminology

Re: [OpenAFS] Re: State of the Michigan shadow system (long)

2010-12-20 Thread Steve Simmons
On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Andrew Deason wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:46:38 -0500 > Steve Simmons wrote: > >> A shadow volume is a read-only remote clone of a primary volume. We >> had to create some terminology here, and 'primary' is what we called >> the real-time, in-use, r/w production

[OpenAFS] Re: State of the Michigan shadow system (long)

2010-12-20 Thread Andrew Deason
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:46:38 -0500 Steve Simmons wrote: > A shadow volume is a read-only remote clone of a primary volume. We > had to create some terminology here, and 'primary' is what we called > the real-time, in-use, r/w production volume. A remote clone closely > resembles a read-only repli