I'm doing this for my site.
As in su or in astro?
It also has the duplicate NAT ping issue, which can cause clients to flood
file servers with substantial amounts of useless traffic in some
situations.
Which in itself should be enough to stop it from being released. But
I'm pessimistic,
Harald Barth h...@kth.se writes:
Which in itself should be enough to stop it from being released. But I'm
pessimistic, Ubuntu has in spite of its popularity issues when it comes
to fixing bugs that they can dismiss by blaming upstream debian. But
maybe my experience is biased from the messy
* Harald Barth [2012-04-07 11:09:53 +0200]:
I'm doing this for my site.
As in su or in astro?
As in astro, for the time being. If others within su want to leverage
my work that can be arranged, but so far I haven't been asked.
It also has the duplicate NAT ping issue, which can cause
Sergio Gelato sergio.gel...@astro.su.se writes:
I also suspect that it's going to take less effort to just maintain PPAs
--- for me personally it's already quite clear, for the community at
large it may be harder to estimate --- than to push updates through the
Ubuntu process, but it doesn't
* Andrew Deason [2012-04-05 12:22:09 -0500]:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:20:03 +0200
Sergio Gelato sergio.gel...@astro.su.se wrote:
My reading of the Ubuntu wiki is that for serious bugs like the ones
in 1.6.0pre1 one can apply for a Stable Release Update.
one can as in, anyone? Or do we need
Sergio Gelato sergio.gel...@astro.su.se writes:
Remind us: what are the reasons (bugs) why one really doesn't want to
run 1.6.1pre1?
1.6.1pre1 at least doesn't have the 1.6.0 file corruption bugs in the
fileserver (which were fixed in 1.6.0-3), but it still has the keep-alive
and idledead
* Russ Allbery [2012-04-04 10:02:28 -0700]:
Jeffrey Altman jalt...@your-file-system.com writes:
On 4/3/2012 10:04 PM, Ken Elkabany wrote:
1.6.0pre1 which was packaged with Ubuntu 11.10. Should we make it a
priority to upgrade?
1.6.0pre1 is not an official OpenAFS release. It was a
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:20:03 +0200
Sergio Gelato sergio.gel...@astro.su.se wrote:
My reading of the Ubuntu wiki is that for serious bugs like the ones
in 1.6.0pre1 one can apply for a Stable Release Update.
one can as in, anyone? Or do we need someone with ubuntu/canonical (or
just a debian
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:40:57 +0100
Thomas Calderon calderon.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is reproductible for me using this approach:
running gnome-screensaver in debug
renew TGT with 10 seconds lifetime and lock
wait 15 minutes - the GUI is freezed
killing in console gives back
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:35:05 -0500 (EST)
Thomas M. Payerle paye...@umd.edu wrote:
I do not see any good ways to get around this. Allowing something
w/out user's tokens read access to ~/.Xauthority seems rather
questionable, plus awkward as needs some access to ~ as well. Could
probably hack
Hi again,
Good to know I'm not alone in this boat, I'll give a shot with a local
Xauthority and fall back to xlock in case I'm not satisfied with the
outcome. Anyway many thanks for the answers you all provided, this mailing
list sure is useful.
Merry Christmas to all!
Thomas.
On Wed, Dec 22,
11 matches
Mail list logo
