Hi,
On Friday, 22 November 2019 19:53:13 CET Kenneth Aaker wrote:
> I just got my OpenAFS server working again after upgrading the system
> from OpenSuSE Leap 42.3 to Leap 15.1. I ran into one puzzling problem
> doing that upgrade. The system upgrade finished after whining about a
> couple
Hi,
I just got my OpenAFS server working again after upgrading the system
from OpenSuSE Leap 42.3 to Leap 15.1. I ran into one puzzling problem
doing that upgrade. The system upgrade finished after whining about a
couple things, but the OpenAFS server (version 1.8.2) didn't know about
any of
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> The situation tends to be fairly customized for each site (and is not a
> terribly common operation), so I don't know of any formal documentation.
> The thread starting at
> https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2017-January/042007.html
> is
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:38:16PM -0500, Susan Litzinger wrote:
> We are in the process of updating from an older version of OpenAFS,
> 1.4.14, to a more recent version, 1.6.16.
>
> The new 1.6.16 servers have been added to our current cell and we are
> moving the volumes from the older servers
We are in the process of updating from an older version of OpenAFS,
1.4.14, to a more recent version, 1.6.16.
The new 1.6.16 servers have been added to our current cell and we are
moving the volumes from the older servers to the new ones. We know that we
have to move the various servers,
Am Donnerstag 04 April 2013, 10:04:16 schrieb Ted Creedon:
then I install the new linux, recompile openaffs, install the init scrips
and everything works fiine on 3 servers.
There's no need to do that on Debian, of course.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinri...@altum.de
Tel:
Am Donnerstag 04 April 2013, 05:45:27 schrieb J:
Wondering if anyone can offer advice as to how best upgrade OpenAFS on
Debian 5.0.2. The OpenAFS kernel module package is listed as
openafs-modules-2.6.26-2-486.
Should I upgrade Linux first, then OpenAFS? Or vice versa? Another option
--On Thursday, April 04, 2013 05:45:27 AM -0700 J skyliner...@yahoo.com wrote:
Wondering if anyone can offer advice as to how best upgrade OpenAFS
on Debian 5.0.2. The OpenAFS kernel module package is listed as
openafs-modules-2.6.26-2-486.
Should I upgrade Linux first, then OpenAFS? Or
I have /vicepa and /usr/afs and /usr/vice all mounted on their own
partitions
then I install the new linux, recompile openaffs, install the init scrips
and everything works fiine on 3 servers.
I've done this on every suse release since 9.x
Tedc
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Bill MacAllister
J skyliner...@yahoo.com writes:
Wondering if anyone can offer advice as to how best upgrade OpenAFS on
Debian 5.0.2. The OpenAFS kernel module package is listed as
openafs-modules-2.6.26-2-486.
Should I upgrade Linux first, then OpenAFS? Or vice versa? Another
option would be to build a
On Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:23:31 AM +0200 Chris Huebsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been there, done that, got no t-shirt.
plug kind=shameless
T-shirts and other cool OpenAFS items are available from the OpenAFS store,
at http://www.cafepress.com/openafs. Proceeds go to support the
I have a server running OpenAFS 1.2.13 on Red Hat Enterprise 3, using
Kerberos 5 for athentication (the AFS server is not one of the KDCs). I
want to upgrade to OpenAFS 1.4.0 and RH Enterprise 4. It seems to me that
the sanest approach may well be to do a fresh install of the OS (on
another
In my last query I asked how to remove openafs from a mac.
Now, I am interested in perhaps 'upgrading'. I don't know what the
latest package is for openafs on the mac, but is the package install
intelligent enough to find prior versions and upgrade them?
--
David Bear
phone: 480-965-8257
fax:
On Mon, 2 May 2005, David Bear wrote:
In my last query I asked how to remove openafs from a mac.
Now, I am interested in perhaps 'upgrading'. I don't know what the
latest package is for openafs on the mac, but is the package install
intelligent enough to find prior versions and upgrade them?
Yes.
Hello all,
I'm currently running a one server for fun cell on RedHat 9 with the
1.2.13 rpms. Is there any documentation about the upgrade procedure to
the latest 1.3.7x? What should I backup before trying this? Thanks for
any help.
-James
--
We are friends with those whose ideas are at the same
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, James Burns wrote:
Hello all,
I'm currently running a one server for fun cell on RedHat 9 with the
1.2.13 rpms. Is there any documentation about the upgrade procedure to
the latest 1.3.7x? What should I backup before trying this? Thanks for
any help.
Replace the binaries, bos
I'm about to upgrade my production machine, and unfortunately
I can't test the upgrade before I do...
I just don't have the resources (time and money for new test
machines), so I just thought I send out this question...
SOMEONE is bound to have done this :)
At 12:44 PM 10/29/04, you wrote:
I'm about to upgrade my production machine, and unfortunately I can't test
the upgrade before I do...
Ok, I'm
game. Clients? Servers? Windows? Unix? Make? Model? Versions?
Upgrade what? I assume you mean client because you said production
machine not
Thus spake Rodney M Dyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I don't know anyone who runs a cell on one server machine.
Well, I do. At home on my private PC. Usefull for connecting the laptop
or doing experiments I don't want to do in the production environment at
university ... ;-)
Hendrik
--
It's not
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Hendrik Hoeth wrote:
Thus spake Rodney M Dyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I don't know anyone who runs a cell on one server machine.
Well, I do. At home on my private PC. Usefull for connecting the laptop
or doing experiments I don't want to do in the production environment at
I think this is the case, but wanted to verify.
When upgrading from Transarc fileserver binaries to OpenAFS, there are
no disk format changes? Just swap out the binaries and go. Correct?
Also, there is no need to change from the Transarc fsck program.
Correct?
Thanks!
Kevin
Depends on the architectures your fileservers are running on. For Linux
and NT Transarc had implemented the NAMEI-interface where you don't need
a special fsck. Here everything should be ok.
On the other architectures I suggest to use also the NAMEI-interface for
some reasons:
1) You get
Sorry, I thought I had put more info in the original message. It is
Solaris on Sparc and I'm not planning to move to the namei server at
this time on that machine. (OK, never on that machine. It needs to be
replaced before that happens.)
Thanks again,
Kevin
Depends on the architectures
23 matches
Mail list logo
