At the very least, I'd like to see a spec included in the source so
that one can rebuild on one's own the binaries from the source (on at
least the base RHEL and current Fedora).
IMHO, not offering binaries and telling users to go someplace else is
not perceived as friendly to the users...
On 6/25/2014 11:39 AM, Dave Botsch wrote:
At the very least, I'd like to see a spec included in the source so
that one can rebuild on one's own the binaries from the source (on at
least the base RHEL and current Fedora).
The underlying issue is what should be in the spec file and who is going
On Jun 25, 2014, at 18:16 , Jeffrey Altman wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:39 AM, Dave Botsch wrote:
At the very least, I'd like to see a spec included in the source so
that one can rebuild on one's own the binaries from the source (on at
least the base RHEL and current Fedora).
The underlying
Thanks to Stephen Quinney, RPMs for Fedora 18/19/20 and Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 5/6 (and clones) are now available.
Note that there are no RHEL7 binaries. The release team feels that we should
not continue to provide packages using the old transarc paths for new Linux
platforms, and that we
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Stephan Wiesand stephan.wies...@desy.de
wrote:
Note that there are no RHEL7 binaries. The release team feels that we
should
not continue to provide packages using the old transarc paths for new Linux
platforms, and that we should leave packaging for those to
On 6/18/2014 2:07 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Stephan Wiesand
stephan.wies...@desy.de mailto:stephan.wies...@desy.de wrote:
Note that there are no RHEL7 binaries. The release team feels that
we should
not continue to provide packages using the
On Jun 18, 2014, at 20:07 , Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Stephan Wiesand stephan.wies...@desy.de
wrote:
Note that there are no RHEL7 binaries. The release team feels that we
should
not continue to provide packages using the old transarc paths for new Linux
