Re: [OpenAFS] Preferred way to do backup? [Was] Re: best way to control "butc" tape host process?

2010-12-20 Thread Steve Simmons
On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > Someone should mention that Michigan has built some kind of infrastructure > around incremental volume shadowing, which should be a pretty efficient > approach given what OpenAFS gives you to work with... I don't know how you > go about

Re: [OpenAFS] Preferred way to do backup? [Was] Re: best way to control "butc" tape host process?

2010-12-17 Thread Matt W. Benjamin
Hi, I may be misremembering here, but my recollection of the current Amanda and Bacula solutions is that they are somewhat primitive, e.g., compared with TiBs or TSM integrations. (I think Russ has talked a not infrequently about further work on Bacula integration would be desirable.) Someone

Re: [OpenAFS] Preferred way to do backup? [Was] Re: best way to control "butc" tape host process?

2010-12-17 Thread Derrick Brashear
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Assarsson, Emil wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for your suggestion. I actually ran into a problem pretty fast > after setting it up via bos. > > Are there a better method of doing backups now days than using the backup > utilities? That's a subjective questio

RE: [OpenAFS] Preferred way to do backup? [Was] Re: best way to control "butc" tape host process?

2010-12-17 Thread Assarsson, Emil
Hi Andrew, Thank you for your suggestion. I actually ran into a problem pretty fast after setting it up via bos. Are there a better method of doing backups now days than using the backup utilities? (It's a totally different question so I updated the subject.) -- Emil -Original Message--