On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 09:51 +0530, prateek arora wrote:
Dear Sir ,
i start openais in two computers.
from one computer i write data into check point ...
then /tmp/openais.conf show this information
Apr 9 15:44:44 [CKPT ] decrementing node id 1141745856 0
Apr 9 15:44:44
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:38 +0800, jay_chen wrote:
Dear All:
I am using 0.80.4 and I encounter a problem.
I have two nodes on different devices and I checkpoint data from
master to slave node.
After they run for a long time, it always return
SA_AIS_ERR_TRY_AGAIN on master. (which is doing
Dear steve:
I add a printf in the following code.
And I got many printf when the problem happen.
I don't understand what is throw away.
Is there any doc or explanation I could reference?
Thanks.
Jay...
== code
if (throw_away_mode == THROW_AWAY_ACTIVE) {
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 09:58:15PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:06:13PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
I'd like to clear up that when Andrew talks about the membership not
generating a leave event for totem processes in this scenario (which he
integrates directly with),
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:02:38PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
The issue that Dave is talking about I believe is described in the
following bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489451
No, not at all.
IMO you should get a leave event for any process that leaves the process
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:35 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:02:38PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
The issue that Dave is talking about I believe is described in the
following bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489451
No, not at all.
IMO you
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:10:33PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:35 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
0. configure token timeout to some long time that is longer than all the
following steps take
1. cluster members are nodeid's: 1,2,3,4
2. cpg foo has the
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 02:17:00PM -0500, David Teigland wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:10:33PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:35 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
0. configure token timeout to some long time that is longer than all the
following steps take
1.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:53:53AM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
what do you think of a half-day / day long miniconference on clustering
along LPC? (http://lwn.net/Articles/319215/)
It's a bit late, but if noone objects, I'll submit a proposal tomorrow.
What topics would you like to see
(send this mail again to remove Spam Mail on title)
Dear steve:
I add a printf in the following code.
And I got many printf when the problem happen.
I don't understand what is throw away.
Is there any doc or explanation I could reference?
Thanks.
Jay...
== code
if
Jim,
Try using this patch with your patchset.
It makes a copy of the constant void *msg into a new merge_detect
struct.
If it looks good go ahead and merge in with your changes on wednesday.
Regards
-steve
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 17:02 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Steven Dake wrote:
On Fri,
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 09:18 +0800, jay_chen wrote:
(send this mail again to remove Spam Mail on title)
Dear steve:
I add a printf in the following code.
And I got many printf when the problem happen.
I don't understand what is throw away.
Is there any doc or explanation I could reference?
12 matches
Mail list logo
