On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Geoff Hutchison wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I've been backed up and have not had much time to merge patches into the
> 2-3-x branch yet. I'll do this over the next 2 days, but I think we'll have
> to push back the actual release until next week.
>
> Suggestions for release
Chris,
I've been backed up and have not had much time to merge patches into the 2-3-x
branch yet. I'll do this over the next 2 days, but I think we'll have to push
back the actual release until next week.
Suggestions for release dates are welcome. Wednesday, perhaps?
> compatible: 4662 definit
Geoff
What are the mechanics for the release? Is the 2-3-x branch the release
candidate? There are some revisions flagged as being not binary
compatible: 4662 definitely; 4699 and 4655 possibly, and there may be
others. Wasn't there an application which checked this? (I can't find
the messages
> I've got commitments on another project in the next two weeks. Could the
> target date for a 2.3.2 release be put back to June 29, with the Git
> migration after that?
No problem. I have a few minor OB projects that we'll squeeze in the meantime.
-Geoff
---
On 29/05/2012 17:17, Geoff Hutchison wrote:
>> Is there some timeline for the release, or just usual "coming soon"?
>
> I think there needs to be a 2.3.x release really soon. I'm waiting to see
> some resolution on Craig/Noel's discussions about stereochem issues.
>
>> Could it be possible to move