Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] Release strategy

2013-10-08 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
A 2.x release doesn't require a whole lot of additional work, although there is usually a target date and an effort to kill as many bugs as possible beforehand. Bug-fix releases (e.g., 2.3.x) are made periodically and appropriate patches are "cherry-picked" from the development tree to the stabl

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] Release strategy

2013-10-03 Thread Craig James
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Maciek Wójcikowski wrote: > I'd like to bring the topic of release frequency of OpenBabel to the > table. Since OB was migrated to the GitHub its development has speed up > noticeably. Last release 2.3.2 was almost one year ago, and I think it's > good time to discu

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] Release strategy

2013-10-02 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
I'm happy to talk generally about release strategy. Usually development occurs on the development version and stable fixes are back ported to 2.3.x branch (or other stable version) close to the time of a release. The reason for the slow release schedule from my perspective is that I just submit

[OpenBabel-Devel] Release strategy

2013-10-02 Thread Maciek Wójcikowski
Hello, I'd like to bring the topic of release frequency of OpenBabel to the table. Since OB was migrated to the GitHub its development has speed up noticeably. Last release 2.3.2 was almost one year ago, and I think it's good time to discuss that matter. One major problem I've noticed is that many