Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-24 Thread Mohammad Mehdi Ghahremanpour
Hi Geoff, I used git bisect and rested to this commit 79000d56e85bd94b1eaebbeb79019e4f26b530fe. Some changes you made, particularly in mol.cpp file disappeared now. But now openbabel uses cc-cd ring conjugated double bond correctly. For example, you made some changes to recognize 7-membered a

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-24 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2014-10-24 14:20, Mohammad Mehdi Ghahremanpour wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > If you remember my previous emails, the developer version often makes > mistake in assigning SP2-conjugated double bonds in the ring systems. > SP2-conjugated double bond should be cc-cd, but the developer version > sometimes

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-24 Thread Mohammad Mehdi Ghahremanpour
Hi Geoff, If you remember my previous emails, the developer version often makes mistake in assigning SP2-conjugated double bonds in the ring systems. SP2-conjugated double bond should be cc-cd, but the developer version sometimes assigns cc-cc that is incorrect. I compared the mol.cpp file be

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-22 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
Atom typing for force fields is not done through the internal type translation. For fidelity, it is done by the force field code itself. I haven't had time to look at code changes, but I suspect there have been GAFF patches since 2.3.2. Geoff On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, David van der Spoel

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-22 Thread David van der Spoel
On 22 okt 2014, at 15:21, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: >> I am using the developer version in my programs, I have to use that, please >> help me understand why the developer version of openbabel has problem to >> match cc and cd atom types. > > The difference is that I noticed v2.3.2 was still

Re: [OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-22 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
> I am using the developer version in my programs, I have to use that, please > help me understand why the developer version of openbabel has problem to > match cc and cd atom types. The difference is that I noticed v2.3.2 was still using the Ghemical force field as the default, which isn't a

[OpenBabel-Devel] one discrepancy between developer version of open babel and the stable version in atom types

2014-10-22 Thread Mohammad Mehdi Ghahremanpour
Hi All, I used obenergy command from two different version of openbabel on the same molecule, but I got two different output. The atom type is different. The molecule is 4-methyloxazole. I once used the developer version and once openbabel-2.3.2. Please have a look at the results presented bel