> The git version seems to compile without issues. Maybe we should release a
> new version to deal with this?
I will work to get the next releases (2.3.3 particularly, but also 2.4.0) going
soon.
I have unfortunately been backlogged with a number of pressing issues,
including grant proposal su
> I have a number of multimolecular complexes that I'm converting into
> canonical SMILES. Some of these molecules are carbon monoxide, and I am
> noticing that sometimes they are written as [C]=O, and sometimes as O=[C].
>
> Is the expected behavior of canonical SMILES - or should it instead
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison <
geoff.hutchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have a number of multimolecular complexes that I'm converting into
> canonical SMILES. Some of these molecules are carbon monoxide, and I am
> noticing that sometimes they are written as [C]=O, and some
