So,
... the final analysis of what it did wrong is something else that it did
wrong? Sigh.
--linas
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> He's focusing on micro-level things they did wrong, but not
> confronting the possibility that making a huge handcoded KB is just
> the wr
He's focusing on micro-level things they did wrong, but not
confronting the possibility that making a huge handcoded KB is just
the wrong thing to be doing...
For instance he notes they have had to add 75 kinds of "in" to handle
different sorts of "in" relationship ... but doesn't question whether
The below is an old presentation, from 2009, but its the first I've seen of
it. Its long, I have not read it yet. However, I suspect that it
probably says good things (I hope; else that would be something else that
CYC did wrong...)
http://c4i.gmu.edu/oic09/papers/Mistakes%20Were%20Made%20OIC%2
