The mapping into description logic looks to make sense...
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:14 PM, 'Adam Gwizdala' via opencog
wrote:
> this looks to me exactly like a definition for a description logic? except
> with some constraints on how you define the classes, properties and
> individuals so that the
this looks to me exactly like a definition for a description logic? except
with some constraints on how you define the classes, properties and
individuals so that they meet only the conditions of Word Grammar?
eg.
--subordinate trans. looks like: 'x hasParent y' paired with respective
inversio
That's exactly it! --linas
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Vishnu Priya
wrote:
>
> I tried like this and it worked !! :-)
>
> echo -e "(define out (open-output-file \"/opt/opencog/file.txt\"))\n(write
>> (nlp-parse \"hello world.\") out)\n(close-output-port out)\n" | nc
>> localhost 17004
>>
I tried like this and it worked !! :-)
echo -e "(define out (open-output-file \"/opt/opencog/file.txt\"))\n(write
> (nlp-parse \"hello world.\") out)\n(close-output-port out)\n" | nc
> localhost 17004
>
Cheers,
Vishnu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
