I was pleased to find recently a fresh new paper from people from the
Cambridge Quantum Computing group that touches and amplify issues I
considered in older posts at
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/opencog/mX93L866Z_Q/rxfaZWkQCgAJ. They
detail a functorial Montague semantics. I find this
intriguing. Any help?
Regards & happy holidays,
Jesús López.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
correction: swap co/contravariant.
On 4/22/17, Jesús López <jesus.lopez.salva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi again, just wanted to drop a pair of thoughts.
>
> What I'm talking about is more of conceptual exploration, categorical
> and liguistically motivated while Ben talk is more
get shorter and more interesting vectors than word2vec gives...
>>>
>>> Suppose that in such a network, for "words surrounding W", one used
>>> "words linked to W in a dependency parse" Then the latent
>>> variables of the generative model me
Hello Ben and Linas,
Sorry for the delay, I was reading the papers. About additivity: In
Coecke's et al. program you turn a sentence into a *multilinear* map
that goes from the vectors of the words having elementary syntactic
category to a semantic vector space, the sentence meaning space. So
Dear Dr. Goertzel and contributors,
You could also enrich the distributional ideas giving support to
compositionality in other way. In your arxiv:1703.04368 you link a pregroup
grammar parse tree of a sentence to a morphism in a symmetric monoidal
category. In work from Coecke, Clark and
