@lists.berlios.de
Subject: RE: [opendx-dev] javadx shareable libraries
Does this include libtools 1.3.4 that was just released
about 4 weeks
ago? From what I've read, this has been greatly improved in the
latest version.
David
David,
If you allow me a 3 weeks time I would put libtools scripts
://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/lloydt/
Peter Daniel Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED]@opendx.watson.ibm.com on
01/13/2000 11:17:59 AM
Please respond to opendx2-dev@lists.berlios.de
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: opendx2-dev@lists.berlios.de
cc:
Subject: Re: [opendx-dev] javadx shareable libraries
I've found
This is some of the stuff that libtool takes care of. It can take and
put the appropriate information into the header of the library and
binaries for linkages. In fact, this is how I noticed that the netcdf
and other libraries need to have shareable versions installed when
using javadx
I just wanted to give everyone a heads up if they plan on dealing with
JavaDX. Since JavaDX must link against shared libraries at runtime, if
you have format such as netcdf compiling in -- that are not made as
shareable libraries, javadx is going to have problems.
The solution? Not quite sure
Suhaib, since I haven't compiled stuff for Windows, what
is your take on
using libtool? Does it solve or create problems?
David,
It actually helps. libtool support for DX had been on my since for
several months. I would like to add libtool support the way I
discussed
a few times on the
I vote with trying to go with libtool. Of course that is assuming that I have a
vote :) I realize that getting things to work the libtool way may not be easy
at first, but once you get it going, the routine maintainance on various
platforms is reduced. I started off trying to tweak Makefiles by
