Shinji, In the EN13606 Association in our SIAMS document we developed a generic semantic patterns that drives all artefacts, One of the sub-patterns is to document a semi-quantitative result. This semi-quantitative result is to document all 'severity' type of things. Always these semi-quantitative things (Severities) are defined in a specific context. So each semi-quantitative semantic sub-pattern allows one to include inclusion and exclusion criteria for each entry in the semantic ordinal sub-pattern. See: http://www.en13606.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Artefact_SubPattern-Semantic_Ordinal_v1.png
And yes, these sub-patterns always are Cluster Models. Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gfrer at luna.nl On 15 Aug 2012, at 10:19, Shinji KOBAYASHI wrote: > Hi Gerald, > > Completely agree with controversy in RISK evaluation. > I have similar experience on SEVERITY evaluation. > openEHR-EHR-problem-diagnosis archetype has severity metrics, > but it does not fit for various evaluation criteria. > I specialized to have a 'severity detail' slot to apply various severity > criteria for many diseases. > As Risk evaluation depends on cases, we need to develop cluster to > express such risk evaluation models on demand. > > Regards, > Shinji -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120816/ce263acb/attachment.html>
