Hi Shinji,

I think the content would be absolutely identical, just a different label! I 
certainly don't think it will risk non-acceptance 😊

I really like the synergy of having 3 coordinated panel discussions within the 
program. I think that would stand out and be valuable from an openEHR 
branding/marketing view. Also sending a clear message that the openEHR 
community is rapidly ramping up.

It will likely be a useful counter to the usual HL7 panels that run each 
conference.

Cheers

Heather

-----Original Message-----
From: openEHR-clinical <openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org> On Behalf 
Of Shinji KOBAYASHI
Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2018 8:51 PM
To: For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical@lists.openehr.org>
Cc: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org>; 
For openEHR implementation discussions <openehr-implement...@lists.openehr.org>
Subject: Re: MEDINFO 2019, Lyon, France.

Hi Heather,

Thank you for reminding.
Developers' workshop has been accepted from 2010. I agree to reorganise the 
contents about openEHR, but I guess "developers workshop' might be an insurance 
to pass reviews.

Regards,
Shinji Kobayashi
2018年9月18日(火) 16:21 Heather Leslie <heather.les...@atomicainformatics.com>:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I've just been talking with Silje about our plans for Medinfo from the 
> clinical modelling program.
>
>
>
> We'd like to share our current thinking and ideas for some broader openEHR 
> engagement.
>
>
>
> 3 Panels:
>
> Clinical modelling panel – focus on community engagement, modelling 
> activity and patterns Technical/developers panel – focus on the 
> technical and software aspects of openEHR, AQL, GDL perhaps 
> Implementers panel – focus on the platform and experience from 
> real-life implementations
>
> There’s almost a tradition now that we’ve held a Clinical modelling and 
> Technical workshop at each Medinfo, but Medinfo’s working definition of a 
> workshop is that the presenters and the audience are meant to be equals and 
> there is a lot of audience participation. While we aspire to this, in reality 
> we really have experts presenting on their latest ideas/work and the audience 
> has variable opportunities to ask questions, which more fits with Medinfo’s 
> definition of a panel. So we are suggesting that we could run a suite of 
> complementary panels covering these 3 areas of openEHR activity.
> @Shinji – I know you have already suggested the developer’s workshop – what 
> do you think of this as an alternative?
>
> Panel exploring how openEHR, FHIR & SNOMED work together – a cross SDO panel!
> Clinical modelling tutorial – teaching participants how easy it is to 
> learn to build a template in half a day Possible papers
>
> Medication family of archetypes – Ian, Hildi & Silje Physical exam 
> patterns – myself
>
>
>
> What do you think about these options?
>
>
>
> Who else has ideas or proposals?
>
>
>
> @Shinji has already set up a wiki page to help us coordinate our 
> efforts - 
> https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/resources/pages/320634886/ME
> DINFO2019
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Heather
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openEHR-clinical <openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org> On 
> Behalf Of Shinji KOBAYASHI
> Sent: Monday, 20 August 2018 11:14 PM
> To: For openEHR clinical discussions 
> <openehr-clinical@lists.openehr.org>; For openEHR technical 
> discussions <openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org>
> Subject: MEDINFO 2019, Lyon, France.
>
>
>
> Dear openEHR colleagues,
>
>
>
> In the next year, MEDINFO 2019 will be in Lyon, France, from 26th to 30th 
> August, 2019.
>
> The application for paper/poster/workshop/tutorial deadline is Nov 12.
>
> This is important, ONLY less than TWO MONTH left for the deadline.
>
> I already launched wiki page for MEDINFO 2019.
>
> https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/resources/pages/320634886/ME
> DINFO2019
>
> If you have some plan for proposal related with openEHR, please give us 
> comments on the wiki or mail.
>
> I will propose the openEHR developers' workshop, again.
>
> AGAIN. Two month is not so long, rather short.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Shinji Kobayashi
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>
> openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.opene
> hr.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.opene
> hr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to