Eric Browne wrote (but it did not get to the list for some reason)
I consider this issue of term/terminology binding and SNOMED particularly
important and so worth clarifying the concepts and also articulating some
principles. I've drafted some preliminary notes - now on the openEHR wiki
(thanks
AThomas Beale wrote:
they are working on the syntax, although it seems relatively solid at
the moment. We are also working collectively within the NHS-sponsored
Technical Advisory Group (TAG) on this. David Markwell is currently
authoring an in-depth report on how to bind such exprssions to
Hi,
I think I thoroughly agree with Sam on most things, but would like to
add another example:
Urine?
Acebutolol;
arbitrary concentration(IOC Screen; 0 1)
M = 336,43 g/mol
Authority: IOC; IFCC/C-LDA; INN
NPU01001
U?Acebutolol;arb.c.(IOC Screen;
Andrew,
Finding codes in this case are what should be used - procedure codes are
also used in openEHR archetypes - but in orders (i..e INSTRUCTIONs). We
need to be extremely careful not to mix them up, in case
users/application software does queries based only on Snomed codes and
ignores
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:17:09PM +0200, Thilo Schuler wrote:
This is a bit problematic as there is one subconcept Urine dipstick test
finding (finding) - 417597005 mentions urine explicitly while the others
don't. Clinically, to my knowledge, in 99,99% urine will be tested with a
dipstick.
Dear Everyone,
as said before Snomed (mostly) models lab properties as procedures and
most other properties as observables. There might however be a change
and a lab observable hierarchy (whatever a lab observable is?) is
under discussion.
Again however, the issue is a bit more tricky as some,
6 matches
Mail list logo
