Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-16 Thread Ian McNicoll
I'm not sure Diego. I guess so. We definitely need to be able to specify at template level how/if any code bindings should be handled at runtime. I suspect this might need some sort of rules that are a bit more complex than just a simple constraint. This conversation might be a chance to tease

Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-16 Thread Bert Verhees
Hi, I need to defer this discussion to next Monday. I will come back to this. Thanks all for your input. Best regards Bert Op wo 15 mrt. 2017 om 23:22 schreef Ian McNicoll : > Hi Bert, > > A dv_coded text can carry a single defining_code but as many code mappings > as you

Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-16 Thread GF
Hi, Multiple codes create the problem of deciding which one is ‘the truth’. One code needs be declared to be ‘the truth’. But… ‘The truth’ depends on the context the code is used in. So how can one declare what the clinical/administrative/research context is? And… ‘subject’ has ‘associated

Re: Problem with constraint_binding

2017-03-16 Thread Diego Boscá
I assume that mappings could also contain constraint bindings right? 2017-03-15 23:20 GMT+01:00 Ian McNicoll : > Hi Bert, > > A dv_coded text can carry a single defining_code but as many code mappings > as you wish. This makes sense to me as I would always expect one code to