[Fwd: RE: Subject of care]

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Beale
Ignacio Valdes wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:24:33 +0930 > >> I think that the only systematic approach is to make a new EHR for >> each genetically distinct individual. This means making an EHR for a >> foetus as soon as anything at all is to be measured about it, and >> also storing the l

Christmas wishes

2002-12-20 Thread Andrew Goodchild
To everyone out there on the openEHR technical list, I would like to wish you all well over the Christmas break. I would especially like to thank Tom Beale for his many many hours of hard work on all the openEHR documentation this year and I would also like to thank all the usual suspects, includ

[Fwd: RE: Subject of care]

2002-12-20 Thread William E Hammond
We actually dealt with this topic at Duke in the OB system in the early 1980s. We did create a record. One interesting problem was "ghost" pregnancies in which it appeared for a period of time to have two fetuses later to be one. Our actually execution turned out to not create the new baby reco

[Fwd: RE: Subject of care]

2002-12-20 Thread Thomas Beale
Matthew Darlison wrote: >Regardig new EHRs etc, might there be scope for mimicking what nature >does - a child EHR which for example must inherit its identifier >context from its mother as it really can only be identified >meaningfully by a qualifier of "this is the demographic person inside