Hi Thomas,
1. I think node_id rather than meaning for the name of this data would be
clearer.
2. A compromise suggestion to address Dipak's issue (which I think is
important) as well as reduce XML bloat:
Change the datatype to just a string but introduce a new section at the
start of the XML
Vincent McCauley wrote:
Hi Thomas,
1. I think node_id rather than meaning for the name of this data would be
clearer.
I suspect we will make this change - most people prefer it
2. A compromise suggestion to address Dipak's issue (which I think is
important) as well as reduce XML bloat:
Dear all,
due to changes in the openEHR website repositories area, the URLs I gave
out previous should be replaced by the following ones:
Text of the CR-00024:
http://www.openehr.org/repositories/spec-0.9_D/latest/publishing/CM/CRs/CR-24.txt
Common Model:
The CR to be considered in this post is CR-000101- Improve Modelling of
Structure classes. See
http://www.openehr.org/repositories/spec/latest/publishing/CM/CRs/CR-00010
1.txt . This CR proposes a change to the Data structure classes which makes
for more efficient data representation. The
Christian Heller wrote:
1. I think node_id rather than meaning for the name of this data would
be clearer.
I suspect we will make this change - most people prefer it
I propose to delete all name, meaning, id or similar fields from
all archetypes. The only way an archetype should be
- every concept, everything in existence (as the human mind perceives it)
is hierarchical, to microcosm as well as towards macrocosm
Including the brain itself ?
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
-
If you have any questions
Christian, you may have misunderstood - the 'meaning' fields in an
archetype are the node-level ids - which also double as codes, whose
meaning is given in the lower part of the archetype. See for example
http://www.openehr.org/repositories/archetype/latest/adl/archetypes/openehr
- every concept, everything in existence (as the human mind perceives it)
is hierarchical, to microcosm as well as towards macrocosm
Including the brain itself ?
Yes, because in our concept of a brain it consists of regions,
neuron cells, organelles, molecules etc.
You have to distinguish
physical brain == carrier of knowledge == neurons, synapses etc. == real world
But they are not interconnected in a hierarchy only, to the
best of my knowledge.
The mind knows about itself and its physical carrier, the brain. But the
functioning of the brain has nothing to do with the abstract
Please note that due to engineering works, the OpenEHR server will have
to be shutdown today until tomorrow morning (approx 9am).
With best wishes,
Nathan
--
Nathan C. Lea
Research Fellow
physical brain == carrier of knowledge == neurons, synapses etc. == real
world
But they are not interconnected in a hierarchy only, to the
best of my knowledge.
I did not say that. I was talking about concepts (mind) only.
The mind knows about itself and its physical carrier, the brain.
11 matches
Mail list logo
