Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

Bert Verhees wrote: You refer to machine computer system interfaces and that these might be proprietary. Yes they could and will. But when the holy grail is about plug-and-play interoperability then these interfaces (archetypes) must be free to use. Gerard, how about SNOMED-tables,

Antw: Re: {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote: www.zorginformatiemodel.nl has about 85 stroke patient related archetypes. unfortunately most are in Dutch, but we have translated about 10 to English now, most the simple ones or the ones that explain the approach also in more technical way. Key is the

removal of data

://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060505/615f1b5a/attachment.html

Archetype conceptual and technical operational are 2 different things

, but unbound to specific technology. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060505/7f32b523/attachment.html

Antw: Re: {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Antw: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Archetype Maintenance

Thomas Beale wrote: Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote: www.zorginformatiemodel.nl has about 85 stroke patient related archetypes. unfortunately most are in Dutch, but we have translated about 10 to English now, most the simple ones or the ones that explain the approach also in more technical

Antw: Re: Archetype conceptual and technical operational are 2 different things

Gerard, William -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060505/7e425796/attachment.html