"comment" is another of these keys (and used in the Ocean Editor)
Regards
Sebastian
Olof Torgersson wrote:
> There have been some discussions, but it seems like the answer to my
> original question, that is, could there be other
> keys than 'text and 'description' is Yes.
>
> 7.3.2, p 50 in th
There have been some discussions, but it seems like the answer to my
original question, that is, could there be other
keys than 'text and 'description' is Yes.
7.3.2, p 50 in the Archetype object model, class ARCHETYPE_TERM
items - "Hash of keys (?text?, ?description? etc) and corresponding
E: hugh.leslie at oceaninformatics.com
>> <mailto:hugh.leslie at oceaninformatics.com> W: www.oceaninformatics.com
>> <http://www.oceaninformatics.com>
>> ___
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org <mailto:openEHR-technical at
>> openehr.org>
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
> ---
> Olof Torgersson
>
> Associate Professor
> Department of Computer Science and Engineering
> Chalmers University of Technology and G?teborg University
> SE-412 96 G?teborg, Sweden
>
> email: oloft at chalmers.se <mailto:oloft at chalmers.se>
> phone: +46 31 772 54 06
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org <mailto:openEHR-technical at openehr.org>
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
>
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081201/326bc49f/attachment.html>
Hi!
Would it be a good or bad idea to have URI:: as a valid terminology
prefix in openEHR terminology bindings, with the intention to host...
1. "local" bindings that are not foreseen to be of public general use:
URI::http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~oloft/terminologies/odont-123/local-Mucos-txtur
2.
Gerard Freriks wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The European Institute for Health Records has created a registry of
> coding systems.
> In the (near) future they expect to be the place where coding systems
> and their meta-information are registered so an URL and unique
> identifying number will suffice.
Koray Atalag wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I had a similar issue lately and just came up with an idea for
> local/custom terminology bindings - i.e. linking at codes to external
> terminologies not formally defined in UMLS or elsewhere.
>
> My problem was to bind terms to latest version of SNOMED throug
ere with formal names.
>
> Cheers,
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20081201/b8d893a6/attachment.html>
7 matches
Mail list logo