Hi Koray,
I agree with Thomas here, Koray, but I take your point about the
separation into a further layer represents added potential development
complexity. I think we should expect tools to handle this in the same
way that a complex development environment like Visual Studio handles
various
these separate layers
during development.
exactly
- thomas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101208/71781480/attachment.html
suggest that the GUI templates just reference paths found in the
openEHR template.
- thomas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101208/57ab6747/attachment.html
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101208/679651d3/attachment.html
Hi Pablo,
In both ADL1.4 and 1.5 every path is still an archetype-based path.
The proposed schema for an operational template is very similar to the
XML schema of an individual archetype but obviously includes multiple
aggregated archetypes and omits any nodes which are constrained out.
5 matches
Mail list logo