Erik Sundvall wrote:
I agree with Seref. ...
If effort is put into new tools it might be good idea to do at least
the GUI in HTML5 etc.
That rules out all of those corporate users that Seref and Ian
mentioned who are stuck on IE6, doesn't it?
- Peter
Pablo Pazos wrote:
Web developers can easily tackle those problems ...
I'm afraid the word easily is wrong, Pablo. I've been doing mostly
web development for the last few years. I specifically mentioned those
things because they are _hard_ to do in in web development, whereas in
desktop
':' are not valid as names in most operating systems, so it would be a
problem even for adl file names. That's why I don't think it is wise
to allow this one in particular.
The other issue was already 'discussed' on the list
http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-technical/msg05294.html
I
...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110912/6bf69e2a/attachment.html
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:54, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com
wrote:
Let's stay with the issue of how we stop someone copyrighting and charging
for a specialised archetype? Or a template that is fundamental to health
care (like an antenatal visit)?
So, Sam have you finally
Dear Colleagues,
I am often asked about the relationship between ISO EN 13606 and openEHR, and I
note this topic has recently been raised on our lists.
To say straight off, some people imagine there are tensions between these, but
most of the people active in taking forward 13606 are also
/20110912/8ee52951/attachment.html
.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110912/1cdf546a/attachment.html
8 matches
Mail list logo
