Intra-archetype semantic relationships

2014-01-15 Thread Thomas Beale
On 15/01/2014 09:09, Diego Bosc? wrote: > I agree that sometimes regular expressions can be tricky, and surely > they don't look pretty on its current form. However, but they have an > advantage: They are formal and easily evaluated in any language. The > problem I see with this approach is that

Intra-archetype semantic relationships

2014-01-15 Thread Gerard Freriks
penEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > ___ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140115/0c955916/attachment-0001.html>

Intra-archetype semantic relationships

2014-01-15 Thread Diego Boscá
rchetype ontology were defined in > a SNOMED extension or similar, the same technical tools could be used to > evaluate slots. > > - thomas > > > ___ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org >