On 15/01/2014 09:09, Diego Bosc? wrote:
> I agree that sometimes regular expressions can be tricky, and surely
> they don't look pretty on its current form. However, but they have an
> advantage: They are formal and easily evaluated in any language. The
> problem I see with this approach is that
penEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140115/0c955916/attachment-0001.html>
rchetype ontology were defined in
> a SNOMED extension or similar, the same technical tools could be used to
> evaluate slots.
>
> - thomas
>
>
> ___
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
>
3 matches
Mail list logo