Re: More generic reference model

2016-09-03 Thread Thomas Beale
this is an eminently sensible suggestion for how to implement certain aspects of terminology processing in an openEHR system. - thomas On 02/09/2016 06:28, Daniel Karlsson wrote: Bert, if I understand your issue correctly, I believe that some sort of "code index" is needed in openEHR

Re: More generic reference model

2016-09-03 Thread Thomas Beale
Bert, doing most of what you want should come in AQL, e.g. the following in a WHERE clause is already possible. SELECT e/ehr_status/subject/external_ref/id/value, diagnosis/data/items[at0002.1]/value FROM EHR e CONTAINS Composition c[openEHR-EHR-COMPOSITION.problem_list.v1]

Re: More generic reference model

2016-09-03 Thread GF
Thomas, I agree. In the Semantic Stack various layers are orthogonal and intersect. The intersection between SNOMED Reference Terminologies and structures (archetypes) is exactly at the righthand side of the ‘is’ relation. Codes from SNOMED are ‘universals’, meaning definitions, like entries in

Re: More generic reference model

2016-09-03 Thread Thomas Beale
On 02/09/2016 04:04, Bert Verhees wrote: On 02-09-16 11:18, Daniel Karlsson wrote: Terminologies typically do not specify which pieces of information are needed in a given situation. Hi Daniel, I don't have at the moment opportunity to reply to all you write, so excuse me for cherrypicking