Re: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 6

this has to be essentially correct, I think. If you think about it, scores (at least well designed ones) are things whose 'questions' have only known answers (think Apgar, GCS etc), each of which has objective criteria that can be provided as training to any basically competent person. When

Re: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 6

Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl Kattensingel 20 2801 CA Gouda the Netherlands > On 5 Jun 2017, at 10:48, William Goossen wrote: > > Hi Heather, > > the key difference is that the assessment scales have a scientific > validation, leading to

Re: Questionnaires

Hi all, First of all, I largely agree with Heather re the current approach. At freshEHR, we generally try to maximise the use of international 'semantic' archetypes, including scales, scores etc but accept that this is often not necessary and that there is place for simply modelling aspects of

Re: Questionnaires

Hi, A few of generic ideas around the question-answer pair. There are several kinds of question-answer pairs: - The general generic pattern is the pair: question - answer; - The questionnaire can be one or more question-answer pairs; - The questions can be locally defined or regionally,

Re: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 6

/www.healthintersections.com.au / grah...@healthintersections.com.au / +61 411 867 065 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.or g/attachments/20170605/1cd4c49e/attachment-0001.html>

RE: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 4

ut (females, > >> children, etc.) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Gerard Freriks > >> +31 620347088 <+31%206%2020347088> > >> gf...@luna.nl > >> > >> > >> > >> On 31 May 2017, at 06:54, Pabl

RE: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 4

ation? >> >> OT: many asked me this and didn't had a good answer. Do we have a >> pattern to model questionnaires? Some require to define questions, >> and the answer type in most cases is boolean, or coded text (multiple >> choice), and answers might be 0..* (more than one answer for

Re: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 4

;>> definition of what the norm/population is is about (females, children, etc.) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Gerard Freriks >>> +31 620347088 <+31%206%2020347088> >>> gf...@luna.nl >>> >>> >>> >>>

Re: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 64, Issue 4

Some require to define questions, and the answer >> type in most cases is boolean, or coded text (multiple choice), and answers >> might be 0..* (more than one answer for the same question is valid). >> >> Cheers, >> >> Pablo. >> >> >> >>

RE: Questionnaires

Thanks Grahame, but I disagree. “• A generic question/answer pattern is next to useless - interoperability is really not helped, especially if both the question and answer has to be managed in the template.” The complete sentence qualifies that the dependence on template modelling is

Re: Questionnaires

hi Heather > A generic question/answer pattern is next to useless - interoperability is really not helped I think you should rather say "A generic question/answer pattern is only useful for exchanging the questions and answers, and does not allow re-use of data". This is not 'next to useless for