On 03/06/2010 00:18, Tim Cook wrote:
Thanks for that research and organization work Erik.
Whether Sam (as a Board member) or anyone else has presented any
'strong arguments' to the other Board members is an unknown and
frankly, I think, is irrelevant.
Over the past decade, we can probably
Hear Hear
David de Bh?l
www.v-practice.com
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Tim Cook timothywayne.cook at gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:15 +0200, Erik Sundvall wrote:
Is the case that Sam or somebody else has later presented strong
arguments to the board that could not and will
Hi Tim
I can't understand why you would suggest that someones concern at
openness (or lack of) at the board level is irrevelant. I can see from
your email that you gave given up on openehr as an organisation which
I think is a great pity.
It seems to me that as the take up and interest in
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:15 +0200, Erik Sundvall wrote:
Is the case that Sam or somebody else has later presented strong
arguments to the board that could not and will not be presented to the
community in the mailinglists or on the wiki? If arguments can not be
presented openly, then the risk
Hi David and others!
I have added a section for summaries of discussions to the bottom of the
page at
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/oecom/openEHR+IP+License+Revision+Proposal
The current version of the text is also included below:
Summary of views by Erik Sundvall (preferring CC-BY)
5 matches
Mail list logo
