It's not a nasty word. But the revolution is over. Now it's implementation time.
This is a typical case of an innovation that is mature enough to be implemented
by many not only by the original inventors.
Venture capitalists don't like revolutionary, it's true.
O. Pishev
Quoting Gerard Freriks
Okay Ognian.
Let us settle for your point of view and agree.
In the mean time you all know that it is, has to be true.
The railway and locomotive,
the steam engine in ships,
the telephone,
the fax,
the PC,
Internet,
the printed book or newspaper,
and many more things were paradigm shifts,
were
Quoting Gerard Freriks gfrer at luna.nl:
Okay Ognian.
Let us settle for your point of view and agree.
In the mean time you all know that it is, has to be true.
The railway and locomotive,
the steam engine in ships,
the telephone,
the fax,
the PC,
Internet,
the printed book or
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:43:51AM +0100, Gerard Freriks wrote:
...
... revolutions, that changed society ...
Past Tense
...
And EN13606 and openEHR will be the same.
Future Tense
Revolutionary can only be applied after the fact.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167
Dear reader,
Healthcare of the future needs ICT-systems of the future.
Healthcare needs systems that are:
-patient safe,
-help respect privacy and
-make 'plug-and-play' exchange between systems possible,
CEN/tc251 has published part 1 of a new exciting European standard
Anything dubbed revolutionary raises cautionary red flags.
As Adrian Midgley once aptly put it:
Ars longa, IT brevis.
Karsten
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:10:09PM +0100, Gerard Freriks wrote:
Subject: CEN published En13606-1 EHRcom. Tutorial about Archetypes
X-Mailer: Apple Mail
Dear Karsten,
For several reasons I was using that special nasty word
revolutionary.
-1-
To be able to get 'plug-and-play' interoperability as opposed to the
very big problem of implementing many messages across vendors in a
uniform way, is REVOLUTIONARY.
-2-
To have a standard with
7 matches
Mail list logo
