> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Browne [mailto:eric at montagesystems.com.au]
> Sent: Saturday, 7 December 2002 2:25 PM
> To: Thomas Beale
> Cc: Sam Heard; openehr-technical at openehr.org
> Subject: Re: Categorising EHR Content
>
>
> Tom & Sam,
>
> Than
Tom & Sam,
Thanks for taking the time to explain the openEHR use of OBSERVATION,
EVALUATION and INSTRUCTION and how these do not limit the ability
to express state and events in a variety of clinical models. When
one moves from thinking in the healthcare space to thinking in the
recording space it
Eric Browne wrote:
>Tom & Sam,
>
>To start with your statement, Tom, regarding the usefulness of recording
>the Bali-bombing in a subject's EHR:
>
>>yep. And consider: while it would in theory be possible to put something
>>in the EHR indicating the fact of the Bali bombing, this is in fact of
>
Eric Browne wrote:
>Sam,
>
>OK. By extrapolation, then, any documentation of a healthcare event
>or non-healthcare event that has occurred in the past, is recorded
>as an observation? Any healthcare event that has not
>yet occurred, but envisaged, is recorded as an instruction?
>
>When a patient
Sam Heard wrote:
>Eric
>
>You are into the territory that Computing and Health care have been swimming
>in for many years - how to model health care - rather than health care
>recording.
>
exactly right. The models we have developed describe in a regular way
the concept of "recording" - whcih th
and their work is all over the web.
>
> Cheers, Sam
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Eric Browne [mailto:eric at montagesystems.com.au]
> > Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2002 10:31 AM
> > To: aniket Joshi
> > Cc: sam.heard at bigpond.com; openehr-te
December 2002 10:31 AM
> To: aniket Joshi
> Cc: sam.heard at bigpond.com; openehr-technical at openehr.org
> Subject: Re: Categorising EHR Content
>
>
> Aniket,
>
> I have refreshed myself on openEHR's clinical model
> terminology, but I still think you miss my poin
am et al,
> >
> > Sometimes it is beneficial to stand back and review
> > the purpose
> > of EHRs, when trying to categorise content. No doubt
> > you have done
> > this far more often than me, but for yet another
> > high level perspective
> > here is my cu
Eric Browne wrote:
>It seems to me that openEHR's view of EHR content is still biased
>towards the healthcare provider's view of the world, as if a person's
>lifelong health status can be represented soley by a linear ( in time)
>sequence of "actions" by healthcare providers. It should be remem
Sam et al,
Sometimes it is beneficial to stand back and review the purpose
of EHRs, when trying to categorise content. No doubt you have done
this far more often than me, but for yet another high level perspective
here is my current view.
Categorising EHR Content
10 matches
Mail list logo
