Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-09 Thread Sam Heard
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070109/087aad98/attachment.html -- next part -- ___ openEHR-technical mailing list

Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-08 Thread Sam Heard
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20070108/b36218e3/attachment.html -- next part -- ___ openEHR-technical mailing list

Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-08 Thread Mattias Forss
2007/1/8, Koray Atalag atalagk at yahoo.com: Currently both the Editor and the Workbench allow these type of errors. Hi Koray, The latest code of the Java Archetype Editor now validates cardinalities. It also has support for all but the demographics archetypes now. Lots of new improvements

Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-08 Thread Koray Atalag
Sam Heard wrote: Thanks Koray Your expression of cardinality and occurrences is exactly correct - there are clearly some errors in the archetypes. The only reason to limit cardinality in the archetype is to force a choice when there are more than one child e.g. container x with

Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-08 Thread Koray Atalag
Stap, R.E. (Roel) wrote: Hello Koray, Reading your issues around cardinallity, perhaps you can solve this issue with help of constrains/business rules. E.g. if you consider in the Archetype model the ability to have a cardinality between A and B of (0..N), you can constrain practically

Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-08 Thread Rong Chen
On 1/8/07, Thomas Beale Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz wrote: Koray Atalag wrote: QUESTION-1: What is the correct approach for above problem? as Sam has said your understanding is correct and the archetype is in error. QUESTION-2: Assume in some other place in the archetype you

Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-08 Thread Mattias Forss
2007/1/8, Thomas Beale Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz: Koray Atalag wrote: QUESTION-1: What is the correct approach for above problem? as Sam has said your understanding is correct and the archetype is in error. QUESTION-2: Assume in some other place in the archetype you

Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-08 Thread Jose Alberto Maldonado
Hi all, we have a doubt regarding the possibility of overriding occurrences of referenced node. The main concern has to do with the fact that a occurrence constraint is part of the semantics of the node being constrained. If it is true, when overriding the occurrences of referenced nodes, do

[Norton AntiSpam] Re: Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-08 Thread Mattias Forss
Hi Jose, I don't think the meaning of the node will not change, but it depends on how you define it. If we think of the reference node (use_node) as a shortcut to an entry form. Also think of it as if that shortcut decided how many times the same entry form would show up. If we override the

Problem in some sample archetypes and questions

2007-01-07 Thread Koray Atalag
Hi to all, While revising my MST archetypes, I came across some confusion on the use of cardinality and occurences. And when I reread ADL 1.4 and ADL2, inspected the sample archetypes and then created new ones with Archetype Editor and also tested with the Workbench my confusion got even more