e and context. Unfortunately, the result is only
> partial interoperability.
correct; as long as your definition of 'interoperability' involves
rendering. I can see that a perfectly reasonable definition is of course
- since a major goal of moving data around is ultimately to get the s
gfrer wrote:
XFORMS perhaps?
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/
>
> Gerard
What about Relaxatron?
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/02/11/relaxtron.html
Unlike W3C schema it makes it simplifies the process
of defining constraints on structured documents.
The RelaxNG bit does the rules about documen
Hi,
XFORMS perhaps?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/
Gerard
-- --
Gerard Freriks, arts
Huigsloterdijk 378
2158 LR Buitenkaag
The Netherlands
+31 252 544896
+31 654 792800
On 10 Mar 2004, at 02:17, Thomas Beale wrote:
> The big picture, as we see it (and we are in no way expert on this
> yet!)
nately, the result is only
partial interoperability.
Coming back to the issue of propositions... A proposition can be
thought of as merely a way to view concepts which are embedded within
the question and answer. Tom already stated this. However, I feel the
EHR should be able to extracted and com
sitive.
...
Jim Warren
Assoc. Prof. Jim Warren
Advanced Computing Research Centre
University of South Australia
Mawson Lakes SA 5095 AUSTRALIA
-Original Message-
From: Matias Klein [mailto:mat...@ethidium.com]
Sent: Friday, 5 March 2004 7:54 AM
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sub
; Jim Warren
>
> Assoc. Prof. Jim Warren
> Advanced Computing Research Centre
> University of South Australia
> Mawson Lakes SA 5095 AUSTRALIA
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matias Klein [mailto:matias at ethidium.com]
> Sent: Friday, 5 March 2004 7:54 AM
> To:
Gerard
The alternative suggestion is to allow the patient to add information to the
EHR
problem list - ie enter diabetes mellitus as a problem. It is true that the
Entry will be known to have come from them. The composition will also come from
them and unless the world changes a little - will
ently
> we faced a requirement to create patient-facing data capture tools.
> Unfortunately we can't seem to find a place in the openEHR model where
> these types of propositions fit cleanly.
>
> For example if I have a patient intake form that has the question, "Do
&g
Matias Klein wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are making incredible progress with the openEHR framework!
> Recently we faced a requirement to create patient-facing data capture
> tools. Unfortunately we can't seem to find a place in the openEHR
> model where these types of p
.com]
Sent: Friday, 5 March 2004 7:54 AM
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Propositions?
Hello All,
We are making incredible progress with the openEHR framework! Recently
we faced a requirement to create patient-facing data capture tools.
Unfortunately we can't seem to find a
The archetype is the archetype and describes a specific concept.
It does not matter who is using the archetype to provide answer.
The author attribute will indicate whether it is the doctor or patient
that filled in the slot in the archetype.
Gerard
-- --
Gerard Freriks, arts
Huigsloterdijk 3
Hello All,
We are making incredible progress with the openEHR framework! Recently
we faced a requirement to create patient-facing data capture tools.
Unfortunately we can't seem to find a place in the openEHR model where
these types of propositions fit cleanly.
For example if I h
12 matches
Mail list logo
