A more realistic example:
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8431/8566bdf17b8b46ad85acbb3.png
definition
COMPOSITION[at] occurrences matches {1..1} matches { -- HIV report
content existence matches {0..1} cardinality matches {1..2;
ordered; unique} matches {
Hi Diego,,
In Ocean .oet files the 'Inital Test' and Subsequent Test semantics are
represented by a name/value redefine on the archetype root nodes. In ADL1.5
we will be able to specialise the root node atCode to do the same thing but
more safely. As you have correctly pointed out before this
Hi Sam,
I would agree. I found something similar when modelling the RCPA
histopathology archetypes. While it seemed sensible to model certain
aspects e.g. 'Lymph node findings' and 'excision margins' as generic
clusters, it became clear that the different reporting requirements of each
cancer
On 02/05/2012 16:19, pablo pazos wrote:
Hi Thomas,
This example is very helpful, thanks.
About Diego's questions and your answers on other emails, as I
understand I have to merge/resolve the ontology section too, so all
needed codes are there without ambiguity.
Is the
Hi Pablo,
when archetypes are flattened, their ids replace the at-codes at the
root points. This example shows the flattened version of the EHR_EXTRACT
template test archetype. You can see the archetype ids, also a remaining
open slot. It's not a proper OPT, so the top root node does not yet
Is the at from the solved slot lost? Is not possible to redefine
the text or description and change it from the at of the included
slot?
I think it would be useful to have it somehow
2012/5/2 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
Hi Pablo,
when archetypes are flattened,
Also, are the at from the resolved template changed in any way?
I see EXTRACT_CHAPTER with [at0002] and ELEMENT with [at0002.1], which
I think it may be changing specialization semantics
2012/5/2 Diego Bosc? yampeku at gmail.com:
Is the at from the solved slot lost? Is not possible to
On 02/05/2012 09:21, Diego Bosc? wrote:
Is the at from the solved slot lost? Is not possible to redefine
the text or description and change it from the at of the included
slot?
I think it would be useful to have it somehow
*
*
the information is still in the archetype - the
On 02/05/2012 10:55, Diego Bosc? wrote:
Also, are the at from the resolved template changed in any way?
I see EXTRACT_CHAPTER with [at0002] and ELEMENT with [at0002.1], which
I think it may be changing specialization semantics
these two codes don't happen to be related - the at0002 is from
Hi,
I'm reading this page trying to understand how to implement archetype
flattening and operational template support to our EHRGen project:
10 matches
Mail list logo
