Re: SV: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-03-23 Thread Thomas Beale
Hi Mikael, On 23/03/2018 09:05, Mikael Nyström wrote: Hi tom, I can agree with you that if SNOMED CT was created when all patients in the world already had all information in their health record recorded using cleverly built and structured information models (like archetypes, templates

SV: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-03-23 Thread Mikael Nyström
Hi tom, I can agree with you that if SNOMED CT was created when all patients in the world already had all information in their health record recorded using cleverly built and structured information models (like archetypes, templates and similar), but that is not the case. Instead SNOMED CT

SV: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-03-22 Thread Mikael Nyström
ch 2018 1:00 AM To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>> Subject: SV: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again Hi Tom, I believe that you proposal to "move / remove the pre-coordinated codes out of SNOM

SV: SV: [Troll] Terminology bindings ... again

2018-03-21 Thread Mikael Nyström
Hi Tom, I believe that you proposal to ”move / remove the pre-coordinated codes out of SNOMED” is very appealing in theory. However it is very difficult in reality to agree on where the line between a suitable pre-coordinated concept and a concept that is better to post-coordinate or handle in