, I'm still wondering whether
or not this may be the dictionary you talk of?
Cheers
Tom
From: Thomas Beale [mailto:thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.biz]
Sent: Saturday, 11 February 2006 1:03 AM
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: dictionary
Bert
Nystr?m
-Original Message-
From: owner-openehr-techni...@openehr.org
[mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Philippe AMELINE
Sent: den 9 februari 2006 15:37
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: dictionary
Hi Mikael,
I would be very sorry to have
: den 9 februari 2006 15:37
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: dictionary
Hi Mikael,
I would be very sorry to have this conversation become too formal or appear
as some criticism. I am much willing to learn, and I think that, as a master
thesis supervisor, you teach Mattias not just
Philippe AMELINE wrote:
What I meant with discourse structure is, for example, the formal
way you can describe a colonoscopy report. It is a huge Archetype, or
rather a set of linked Archetypes.
The reason why I call it discourse structure is because I really
think it is important to see
: RE: dictionary
Hi Philippe,
From my point of view is the lack of communicable structure between different
EHR systems the main problem openEHR's archetypes tries to solve.
I think this is what Mattias tries to say with his letter. In general medical
informatics is it of cause also a large need
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060210/5abebf37/attachment.html
Philippe AMELINE wrote:
Hi Mikael,
I would be very sorry to have this conversation become too formal or
appear as some criticism. I am much willing to learn, and I think
that, as a master thesis supervisor, you teach Mattias not just to be
happy with established concepts but to have a
Thomas Beale a ?crit :
My feeling is that the good order to ask questions (and answer it) is :
Why do you want to communicate ?
What discourse complexity level can allow to address these needs ?
What discourse representation technology fits these required
language ?
I think it is
Hi Philippe,
Well I started in the domain 20 weeks ago and I didn't know anything
back then (in the old days). I'm currently on my way of finishing my
master's thesis, so I cannot say I have the experience to answer your
questions ;-)
PS. Your questions are sensible though, no offense
Cheers,
Of Philippe AMELINE
Sent: den 9 februari 2006 12:34
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: dictionary
Hi Mattias,
The more I work on medical information systems, and the less I believe that
the structure is more important than the terminology.
To be a little bit more accurate, my opinion
Of Philippe AMELINE
Sent: den 9 februari 2006 12:34
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: dictionary
Hi Mattias,
The more I work on medical information systems, and the less I believe that
the structure is more important than the terminology.
To be a little bit more accurate, my opinion
- Original Message -
From: Bert Verhees bert.verh...@rosa.nl
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:32 PM
Subject: dictionary
Hi,
I have a question, maybe a stupid question, don't hesitate to tell me (I
can handle that), as long as you give
You can plug in any dictionary or terminology set into openEHR. It is
terminology independent.
O. Pishev
- Original Message -
From: Mattias Forss matfo...@student.liu.se
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: dictionary
of Dictionary with 6000 words, (also these words are
possibly related to each other, that makes it an extra strong feature).
The relationship between the words is not hard coded and is not stored
in medical-records, so if the relationship changes, nothing breaks, even
if a word from the dictionary
14 matches
Mail list logo