February 2012 4:44 AM
To: For openEHR technical discussions
Subject: Re: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 67, Issue 34
How can anyone say that HL7 is open in any fashion? You are not free
to distribute it outside of your organization except in small parts so
that the specifications cannot
March 2012 09:34
To: 'For openEHR technical discussions'
Subject: RE: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 67, Issue 34
Hi Tim
HL7 Twittered about making things more openly available the other
daydoes anyone have the link?
Cheers, Sam
-Original Message-
From: openehr-technical-bounces
On 20/02/2012 22:34, William Goossen wrote:
Hi Heath, Thomas,
My experience is that HL7 v3 is an open standard and OpenEHR is proprietary
(as owned by the OpenEHR foundation holding the copyrights, albeit I
understand that work is underway to sort that out).
*
*
Correction: HL7 is open,
Ar this stage membership is open to anyone for both HL7 and OpenEHR. Hence they
are both open. Difference is that HL7 is an SDO and OpenEHR a community. But
yes both have their copyright approaches. I have not gone through each of them
in detail. But as a user of both platforms it does not make
Hi William,
I think you may have misread who wrote what. The assertion that HL7 is
proprietary was made by Fred Trotter, not by Heath.
Peter
fred trotter wrote:
...
Having said that, HL7 RIM is a proprietary ontology/model and OpenEHR, is
not.
William Goossen wrote:
Ar this stage
[mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of
openehr-technical-request at openehr.org
Sent: maandag 20 februari 2012 23:25
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 67, Issue 34
Send openEHR-technical mailing list submissions to
openehr
-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of
openehr-technical-request at openehr.org
Sent: maandag 20 februari 2012 23:25
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 67, Issue 34
Send openEHR-technical mailing list submissions to
openehr-technical
7 matches
Mail list logo
