occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread Andrew Patterson
On 11/11/2011 5:11 AM, Thomas Beale wrote: In the current ADL 1.4-based XSDs used in openEHR, occurrences, cardinality and existence are expressed as XML elements. We will want to improve this for ADL 1.5 based XML. Now, we don't want to only take care of XML; we also need to make it work

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread Sam Heard
-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/2011/3c173711/attachment.html

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread Diego Boscá
Although this would work, I think that it would make ADL far less readable and would oblige people to know always the reference model underneath AND their parent archetype (if for some reason the parent archetype is not available then you are completely screwed). Even if you say that people should

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread Thomas Beale
): occurrence: 2.. well, that's close to what I generate in dADL right now: but XML developers don't like that. - thomas -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/2011

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread Thomas Beale
On 11/11/2011 07:34, Diego Bosc? wrote: Although this would work, I think that it would make ADL far less readable and would oblige people to know always the reference model to be clear, I am not proposing to make any change at all to ADL. ADL is meant as a proper readable, mathematical formal

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread Thomas Beale
On 11/11/2011 08:19, Erik Sundvall wrote: Hi! On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:34, Diego Bosc?yampeku at gmail.com wrote: Although this would work, I think that it would make ADL far less readable Some readability thoughts... When a value (e.g. upper bound) may be either a number or a symbol (*

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread Ian McNicoll
Apart from the size issue, readability is a particular problem because of the verbosity of the current XML schema. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll office +44 (0)1536 414 994 fax +44 (0)1536 516317 mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 skype ianmcnicoll ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com Clinical Modelling

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread Ian McNicoll
Hi Andrew, In principle I agree. I speak only as one of the poor sods who sometimes has to visually check the .opt template schemas and which use the same format. I know - get a tool :-) But even in something like XMLSpy it can get hard to see the clinical wood for the occurences trees. Ian Dr

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

2011-11-11 Thread pablo pazos
at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/2011